NM_000095.3:c.218-14C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000095.3(COMP):​c.218-14C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0167 in 1,520,822 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 272 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.013 ( 25 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.017 ( 247 hom. )

Consequence

COMP
NM_000095.3 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.623

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
COMP (HGNC:2227): (cartilage oligomeric matrix protein) The protein encoded by this gene is a noncollagenous extracellular matrix (ECM) protein. It consists of five identical glycoprotein subunits, each with EGF-like and calcium-binding (thrombospondin-like) domains. Oligomerization results from formation of a five-stranded coiled coil and disulfides. Binding to other ECM proteins such as collagen appears to depend on divalent cations. Contraction or expansion of a 5 aa aspartate repeat and other mutations can cause pseudochondroplasia (PSACH) and multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (MED). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2016]
COMP Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • pseudoachondroplasia
    Inheritance: AD, Unknown Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Illumina
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.84).
BP6
Variant 19-18790128-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-18790128-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255122.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0131 (1996/152016) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0197 (1339/67894). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0188. There are 25 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 998 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 1996 AD,Unknown gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
COMPNM_000095.3 linkc.218-14C>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 18 ENST00000222271.7 NP_000086.2 P49747-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
COMPENST00000222271.7 linkc.218-14C>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 18 1 NM_000095.3 ENSP00000222271.2 P49747-1
COMPENST00000542601.6 linkc.119-14C>T intron_variant Intron 2 of 17 1 ENSP00000439156.2 G3XAP6
COMPENST00000425807.1 linkc.218-14C>T intron_variant Intron 3 of 17 2 ENSP00000403792.1 P49747-2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0131
AC:
1997
AN:
151898
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00363
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0153
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00664
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000195
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00517
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0189
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00949
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0197
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0110
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0129
AC:
1580
AN:
122210
AF XY:
0.0130
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00262
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0120
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00644
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.0173
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0204
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0155
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0170
AC:
23337
AN:
1368806
Hom.:
247
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0168
AC XY:
11327
AN XY:
673144
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00325
AC:
101
AN:
31064
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0115
AC:
398
AN:
34566
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00592
AC:
143
AN:
24146
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000566
AC:
2
AN:
35342
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00775
AC:
600
AN:
77402
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0159
AC:
601
AN:
37682
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0161
AC:
64
AN:
3982
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0192
AC:
20548
AN:
1067804
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0155
AC:
880
AN:
56818
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.550
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1260
2520
3779
5039
6299
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
788
1576
2364
3152
3940
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0131
AC:
1996
AN:
152016
Hom.:
25
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0134
AC XY:
998
AN XY:
74314
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00361
AC:
150
AN:
41498
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0153
AC:
234
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5128
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00497
AC:
24
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0189
AC:
200
AN:
10594
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0102
AC:
3
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0197
AC:
1339
AN:
67894
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
23
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.513
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
103
206
309
412
515
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
24
48
72
96
120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00863
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.0119
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00260
AC:
9
AN:
3476

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:4
Oct 21, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Nov 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 30, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:2
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 12, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Pseudoachondroplastic spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.84
CADD
Benign
4.6
DANN
Benign
0.93
PhyloP100
-0.62
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs150008764; hg19: chr19-18900937; API