NM_000112.4:c.2220A>G

Variant names:

• chr5-149981813-A-G
• rs61732052
• NM_000112.4:c.2220A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_Strong BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_000112.4(SLC26A2):​c.2220A>G​(p.Ter740Ter) variant causes a stop retained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00238 in 1,603,716 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 (33 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 (40 hom.)
• Consequence: SLC26A2 NM_000112.4 stop_retained
• Clinical Significance: Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.378

Genes affected

SLC26A2 (HGNC:10994): (solute carrier family 26 member 2) The diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter is a transmembrane glycoprotein implicated in the pathogenesis of several human chondrodysplasias. It apparently is critical in cartilage for sulfation of proteoglycans and matrix organization. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
• BP6: Variant 5-149981813-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149981813-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 255133.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr5-149981813-A-G is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.378 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1884/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0436 (1811/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0419. There are 33 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 883 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 33 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
SLC26A2	NM_000112.4	c.2220A>G	p.Ter740Ter	stop_retained_variant	Exon 3 of 3	ENST00000286298.5	NP_000103.2
SLC26A2	XM_017009191.3	c.2220A>G	p.Ter740Ter	stop_retained_variant	Exon 3 of 4		XP_016864680.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
SLC26A2	ENST00000286298.5	c.2220A>G	p.Ter740Ter	stop_retained_variant	Exon 3 of 3	1	NM_000112.4	ENSP00000286298.4
SLC26A2	ENST00000503336.1	c.372+3462A>G		intron_variant	Intron 1 of 1	3		ENSP00000426053.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0124 AC: 1880 AN: 152168 Hom.: 32 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0436

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00275

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.000162

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00955

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00324 AC: 800 AN: 246646 Hom.: 13 AF XY: 0.00257 AC XY: 345 AN XY: 134180

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0463

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00216

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.0000991

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.000117

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.000665

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00133 AC: 1934 AN: 1451430 Hom.: 40 Cov.: 27 AF XY: 0.00121 AC XY: 877 AN XY: 722552

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0463

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00207

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000582

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000888

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00320

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0124 AC: 1884 AN: 152286 Hom.: 33 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0119 AC XY: 883 AN XY: 74462

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0436

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00275

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.000162

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00945

Alfa AF: 0.00864 Hom.: 10

Bravo AF: 0.0143

Asia WGS AF: 0.00202 AC: 7 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:12

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jul 17, 2017

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Achondrogenesis, type IB Benign:2

Sep 16, 2020

Natera, Inc.

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:2

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Oct 23, 2024

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4 Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Diastrophic dysplasia;C0265274:Achondrogenesis, type IB;C1847593:Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4;C1850554:Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1

Feb 03, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Sulfate transporter-related osteochondrodysplasia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Diastrophic dysplasia Benign:1

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1

Aug 01, 2019

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.87
CADD	Benign	2.8
DANN	Benign	0.57

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.020		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61732052; hg19: chr5-149361376;