NM_000112.4:c.2220A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000112.4(SLC26A2):​c.2220A>G​(p.Ter740Ter) variant causes a stop retained change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00238 in 1,603,716 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 73 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.012 ( 33 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0013 ( 40 hom. )

Consequence

SLC26A2
NM_000112.4 stop_retained

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:12

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.378

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SLC26A2 (HGNC:10994): (solute carrier family 26 member 2) The diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter is a transmembrane glycoprotein implicated in the pathogenesis of several human chondrodysplasias. It apparently is critical in cartilage for sulfation of proteoglycans and matrix organization. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
SLC26A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • achondrogenesis type IB
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, G2P, ClinGen
  • atelosteogenesis type II
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen, Ambry Genetics
  • diastrophic dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, G2P

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BP6
Variant 5-149981813-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-149981813-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 255133.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.378 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0124 (1884/152286) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0436 (1811/41558). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0419. There are 33 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 883 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 33 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SLC26A2NM_000112.4 linkc.2220A>G p.Ter740Ter stop_retained_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000286298.5 NP_000103.2
SLC26A2XM_017009191.3 linkc.2220A>G p.Ter740Ter stop_retained_variant Exon 3 of 4 XP_016864680.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SLC26A2ENST00000286298.5 linkc.2220A>G p.Ter740Ter stop_retained_variant Exon 3 of 3 1 NM_000112.4 ENSP00000286298.4
SLC26A2ENST00000503336.1 linkc.372+3462A>G intron_variant Intron 1 of 1 3 ENSP00000426053.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0124
AC:
1880
AN:
152168
Hom.:
32
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0436
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00275
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000162
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00955
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00324
AC:
800
AN:
246646
AF XY:
0.00257
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0463
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000117
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000665
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00133
AC:
1934
AN:
1451430
Hom.:
40
Cov.:
27
AF XY:
0.00121
AC XY:
877
AN XY:
722552
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0463
AC:
1536
AN:
33190
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00207
AC:
92
AN:
44530
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26048
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39662
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000582
AC:
5
AN:
85870
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
52568
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00191
AC:
11
AN:
5754
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000888
AC:
98
AN:
1103734
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00320
AC:
192
AN:
60074
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.468
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
85
170
255
340
425
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
50
100
150
200
250
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0124
AC:
1884
AN:
152286
Hom.:
33
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0119
AC XY:
883
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0436
AC:
1811
AN:
41558
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00275
AC:
42
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4820
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10626
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000162
AC:
11
AN:
68016
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00945
AC:
20
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.500
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
86
171
257
342
428
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00908
Hom.:
12
Bravo
AF:
0.0143
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00202
AC:
7
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.000109
EpiControl
AF:
0.000237

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:12
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:2
Jul 17, 2017
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Achondrogenesis, type IB Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Oct 23, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Diastrophic dysplasia;C0265274:Achondrogenesis, type IB;C1847593:Multiple epiphyseal dysplasia type 4;C1850554:Atelosteogenesis type II Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sulfate transporter-related osteochondrodysplasia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Diastrophic dysplasia Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Connective tissue disorder Benign:1
Aug 01, 2019
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.87
CADD
Benign
2.8
DANN
Benign
0.57
PhyloP100
0.38
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.020
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs61732052; hg19: chr5-149361376; API