NM_000123.4:c.2877A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000123.4(ERCC5):c.2877A>C(p.Arg959Ser) variant causes a missense, splice region change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000627 in 1,614,174 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 4 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 1/1 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000123.4 missense, splice_region
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCC5 | NM_000123.4 | c.2877A>C | p.Arg959Ser | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 13 of 15 | ENST00000652225.2 | NP_000114.3 | |
| BIVM-ERCC5 | NM_001204425.2 | c.4239A>C | p.Arg1413Ser | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 21 of 23 | NP_001191354.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCC5 | ENST00000652225.2 | c.2877A>C | p.Arg959Ser | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 13 of 15 | NM_000123.4 | ENSP00000498881.2 | |||
| BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639435.1 | c.4239A>C | p.Arg1413Ser | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 23 of 25 | 5 | ENSP00000491742.1 | |||
| BIVM-ERCC5 | ENST00000639132.1 | c.3552A>C | p.Arg1184Ser | missense_variant, splice_region_variant | Exon 22 of 24 | 5 | ENSP00000492684.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00342 AC: 521AN: 152190Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00103 AC: 258AN: 251364 AF XY: 0.000846 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000337 AC: 493AN: 1461866Hom.: 1 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000305 AC XY: 222AN XY: 727230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00341 AC: 519AN: 152308Hom.: 3 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00318 AC XY: 237AN XY: 74474 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
The ERCC5 p.Arg959Ser variant was not identified in the literature nor was it identified in Cosmic or LOVD 3.0. The variant was identified in dbSNP (ID: rs41281674) and ClinVar (classification not provided, submitted by ITMI). The variant was identified in control databases in 360 of 282766 chromosomes (1 homozygous) at a frequency of 0.001273 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Database March 6, 2019, v2.1.1). The variant was observed in the following populations: African in 317 of 24960 chromosomes (freq: 0.0127), Other in 7 of 7222 chromosomes (freq: 0.000969), Latino in 30 of 35422 chromosomes (freq: 0.000847), European (Finnish) in 1 of 25122 chromosomes (freq: 0.00004) and European (non-Finnish) in 5 of 129120 chromosomes (freq: 0.000039), but was not observed in the Ashkenazi Jewish, East Asian and South Asian populations. The p.Arg959 residue is conserved in mammals and computational analyses (PolyPhen-2, SIFT, AlignGVGD, BLOSUM, MutationTaster) provide inconsistent predictions regarding the impact to the protein; this information is not very predictive of pathogenicity. The p.Arg959Ser variant occurs in the third last base of the exon. This position has been shown to be part of the splicing consensus sequence and variants involving this position sometimes affect splicing. However, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time. This variant is classified as a variant of uncertain significance. -
not specified Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at