NM_000181.4:c.1050G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points: 0P and 8B. BP4_ModerateBP6BP7BS1

The NM_000181.4(GUSB):​c.1050G>A​(p.Lys350Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000123 in 1,613,888 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00013 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

GUSB
NM_000181.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.444

Publications

6 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
GUSB (HGNC:4696): (glucuronidase beta) This gene encodes a hydrolase that degrades glycosaminoglycans, including heparan sulfate, dermatan sulfate, and chondroitin-4,6-sulfate. The enzyme forms a homotetramer that is localized to the lysosome. Mutations in this gene result in mucopolysaccharidosis type VII. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. There are many pseudogenes of this locus in the human genome.[provided by RefSeq, May 2014]
GUSB Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • mucopolysaccharidosis type 7
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, ClinGen, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -8 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).
BP6
Variant 7-65974934-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr7-65974934-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 908806.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.444 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000525 (8/152302) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.00155 (8/5176). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000769. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 3 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
GUSBNM_000181.4 linkc.1050G>A p.Lys350Lys synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 12 ENST00000304895.9 NP_000172.2 P08236-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
GUSBENST00000304895.9 linkc.1050G>A p.Lys350Lys synonymous_variant Exon 6 of 12 1 NM_000181.4 ENSP00000302728.4 P08236-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152184
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000319
AC:
8
AN:
251144
AF XY:
0.0000221
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000435
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000130
AC:
190
AN:
1461586
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000110
AC XY:
80
AN XY:
727096
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
33472
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
44716
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26132
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00471
AC:
187
AN:
39698
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
53418
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5720
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
8.99e-7
AC:
1
AN:
1111830
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0000331
AC:
2
AN:
60364
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.494
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
11
22
34
45
56
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000525
AC:
8
AN:
152302
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000403
AC XY:
3
AN XY:
74462
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41568
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15294
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00155
AC:
8
AN:
5176
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4826
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10624
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
68024
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.506
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
3
4
5
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.00
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000189

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Mucopolysaccharidosis type 7 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Mar 18, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.45
CADD
Benign
3.6
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
0.44

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.10
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs121918182; hg19: chr7-65439921; API