NM_000251.3:c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 2P and 1B. PM4BP6
The NM_000251.3(MSH2):c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG(p.Glu859_Gln861del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000954 in 1,613,988 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. E859E) has been classified as Benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000251.3 disruptive_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Lynch syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
- Lynch syndrome 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- Muir-Torre syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, G2P
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Orphanet
- mismatch repair cancer syndrome 2Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P
- ovarian cancerInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- malignant pancreatic neoplasmInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- prostate cancerInheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- rhabdomyosarcomaInheritance: AR Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- breast cancerInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
- hereditary breast carcinomaInheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000251.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSH2 | NM_000251.3 | MANE Select | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 16 | NP_000242.1 | ||
| MSH2 | NM_001406674.1 | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 18 | NP_001393603.1 | |||
| MSH2 | NM_001406631.1 | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 18 | NP_001393560.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSH2 | ENST00000233146.7 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000233146.2 | ||
| MSH2 | ENST00000406134.5 | TSL:1 | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 16 | ENSP00000384199.1 | ||
| MSH2 | ENST00000645506.1 | c.2576_2584delAATCGCAAG | p.Glu859_Gln861del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 15 of 17 | ENSP00000495455.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000199 AC: 5AN: 251448 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000103 AC: 150AN: 1461832Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000908 AC XY: 66AN XY: 727220 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000404 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74338 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
ClinVar submissions as Germline
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at