NM_000260.4:c.6013A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points: 2P and 9B. PM2BP4_StrongBP6BS1

The NM_000260.4(MYO7A):​c.6013A>G​(p.Lys2005Glu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000994 in 1,579,400 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: š‘“ 0.00034 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes š‘“: 0.000074 ( 1 hom. )

Consequence

MYO7A
NM_000260.4 missense

Scores

2
11
6

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:4

Conservation

PhyloP100: 8.95
Variant links:
Genes affected
MYO7A (HGNC:7606): (myosin VIIA) This gene is a member of the myosin gene family. Myosins are mechanochemical proteins characterized by the presence of a motor domain, an actin-binding domain, a neck domain that interacts with other proteins, and a tail domain that serves as an anchor. This gene encodes an unconventional myosin with a very short tail. Defects in this gene are associated with the mouse shaker-1 phenotype and the human Usher syndrome 1B which are characterized by deafness, reduced vestibular function, and (in human) retinal degeneration. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -7 ACMG points.

PM2
Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.015482843).
BP6
Variant 11-77208765-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-77208765-A-G is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 43311.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submissions are: {Likely_benign=3, Uncertain_significance=1}.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population amr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.000341 (52/152300) while in subpopulation AMR AF= 0.00333 (51/15308). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0026. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 28 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
MYO7ANM_000260.4 linkc.6013A>G p.Lys2005Glu missense_variant Exon 44 of 49 ENST00000409709.9 NP_000251.3 Q13402-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
MYO7AENST00000409709.9 linkc.6013A>G p.Lys2005Glu missense_variant Exon 44 of 49 1 NM_000260.4 ENSP00000386331.3 Q13402-1
MYO7AENST00000458637.6 linkc.5899A>G p.Lys1967Glu missense_variant Exon 44 of 49 1 ENSP00000392185.2 Q13402-2
MYO7AENST00000409619.6 linkc.5866A>G p.Lys1956Glu missense_variant Exon 45 of 50 1 ENSP00000386635.2 Q13402-8
MYO7AENST00000458169.2 linkc.3439A>G p.Lys1147Glu missense_variant Exon 24 of 29 1 ENSP00000417017.2 H7C4D8
MYO7AENST00000670577.1 linkn.*585A>G non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 27 of 32 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94
MYO7AENST00000670577 linkn.*585A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 27 of 30 ENSP00000499323.1 A0A590UJ94

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000342
AC:
52
AN:
152182
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00334
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.000298
AC:
58
AN:
194636
Hom.:
0
AF XY:
0.000211
AC XY:
22
AN XY:
104030
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00202
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000736
AC:
105
AN:
1427100
Hom.:
1
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
38
AN XY:
706492
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0000307
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00258
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.0000169
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000341
AC:
52
AN:
152300
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000376
AC XY:
28
AN XY:
74468
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00333
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.000128
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000416
ExAC
AF:
0.000108
AC:
13

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:4
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 12, 2020
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Autosomal dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss 11 Uncertain:1
Jan 30, 2018
Baylor Genetics
Significance: Uncertain significance
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

not specified Benign:1
May 10, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

p.Lys2005Glu in exon 44 of MYO7A: This variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it has been identified in 0.65% (9/1386) of Latino chromoso mes by the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC, http://exac.broadinstitute.org; d bSNP rs186644871). -

MYO7A-related disorder Benign:1
Sep 22, 2023
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Uncertain
0.51
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.15
T
BayesDel_noAF
Uncertain
0.0
CADD
Uncertain
25
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Uncertain
0.62
D;.;.;T
Eigen
Uncertain
0.36
Eigen_PC
Uncertain
0.41
FATHMM_MKL
Pathogenic
0.99
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;D;D;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.055
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.015
T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
-0.19
T
MutationAssessor
Uncertain
2.3
M;.;.;.
PrimateAI
Pathogenic
0.83
D
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-3.5
D;D;D;D
REVEL
Uncertain
0.63
Sift
Benign
0.11
T;T;T;D
Sift4G
Benign
0.19
T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.029
B;.;.;.
Vest4
0.83
MVP
0.88
MPC
0.18
ClinPred
0.21
T
GERP RS
4.5
Varity_R
0.71
gMVP
0.66

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs186644871; hg19: chr11-76919810; API