NM_000262.3:c.280G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points: 0P and 11B. BP4_ModerateBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000262.3(NAGA):​c.280G>A​(p.Asp94Asn) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00178 in 1,612,702 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0012 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0018 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

NAGA
NM_000262.3 missense

Scores

2
3
14

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:6B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: 6.17

Publications

8 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NAGA (HGNC:7631): (alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase) NAGA encodes the lysosomal enzyme alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase, which cleaves alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminyl moieties from glycoconjugates. Mutations in NAGA have been identified as the cause of Schindler disease types I and II (type II also known as Kanzaki disease). [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NAGA Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 2
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 1
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -11 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09071505).
BP6
Variant 22-42067809-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr22-42067809-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity]. Clinvar id is 341912.We mark this variant Likely_benign, oryginal submission is: [Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity].
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.00121 (184/152304) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.00201 (137/68030). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00174. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 73 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NAGANM_000262.3 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 3 of 9 ENST00000396398.8 NP_000253.1 P17050A0A024R1Q5
NAGANM_001362848.1 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 10 NP_001349777.1
NAGANM_001362850.1 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 10 NP_001349779.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NAGAENST00000396398.8 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 3 of 9 1 NM_000262.3 ENSP00000379680.3 P17050
NAGAENST00000402937.1 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 10 5 ENSP00000384603.1 P17050
NAGAENST00000403363.5 linkc.280G>A p.Asp94Asn missense_variant Exon 4 of 10 5 ENSP00000385283.1 P17050

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00121
AC:
184
AN:
152186
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000410
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00111
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00317
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0000941
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00201
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.00132
AC:
331
AN:
250106
AF XY:
0.00126
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000369
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00119
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00109
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000344
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00226
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00147
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00184
AC:
2694
AN:
1460398
Hom.:
5
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.00174
AC XY:
1263
AN XY:
726558
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000329
AC:
11
AN:
33466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00132
AC:
59
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00119
AC:
31
AN:
26134
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
86248
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000651
AC:
34
AN:
52206
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5642
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00222
AC:
2465
AN:
1111916
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00156
AC:
94
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.492
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
153
306
459
612
765
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
86
172
258
344
430
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00121
AC:
184
AN:
152304
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.000980
AC XY:
73
AN XY:
74472
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.000409
AC:
17
AN:
41570
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00111
AC:
17
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00317
AC:
11
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5172
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0000941
AC:
1
AN:
10622
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.00201
AC:
137
AN:
68030
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10
21
31
42
52
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0268
Hom.:
1473
Bravo
AF:
0.00134
TwinsUK
AF:
0.00162
AC:
6
ALSPAC
AF:
0.00311
AC:
12
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.000454
AC:
2
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.00163
AC:
14
ExAC
AF:
0.00125
AC:
152
Asia WGS
AF:
0.000289
AC:
1
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.00164
EpiControl
AF:
0.00219

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:6Benign:3
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Feb 18, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant does not alter protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Jan 13, 2020
Mayo Clinic Laboratories, Mayo Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NAGA: BP4, BS2 -

Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 2 Uncertain:2
Jan 18, 2018
Baylor Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was determined to be of uncertain significance according to ACMG Guidelines, 2015 [PMID:25741868]. -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Dec 19, 2024
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 2;C1836544:Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase deficiency type 1 Uncertain:1
Oct 31, 2018
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

NAGA-related disorder Benign:1
Feb 08, 2022
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.21
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.34
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.25
CADD
Benign
22
DANN
Uncertain
1.0
DEOGEN2
Pathogenic
0.90
D;D;D
Eigen
Benign
-0.22
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.15
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.96
D
LIST_S2
Pathogenic
0.98
.;.;D
M_CAP
Benign
0.051
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.091
T;T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.45
T
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.4
L;L;L
PhyloP100
6.2
PrimateAI
Benign
0.44
T
PROVEAN
Uncertain
-2.5
N;N;N
REVEL
Benign
0.25
Sift
Benign
0.13
T;T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.17
T;T;T
Polyphen
0.11
B;B;B
Vest4
0.68
MVP
0.87
MPC
0.35
ClinPred
0.055
T
GERP RS
3.6
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.54
gMVP
0.91
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs73167107; hg19: chr22-42463813; COSMIC: COSV67169793; API