NM_000301.5:c.693_695delGAA
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points: 1P and 0B. PM4_Supporting
The NM_000301.5(PLG):c.693_695delGAA(p.Lys231del) variant causes a disruptive inframe deletion change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000934 in 1,606,512 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000301.5 disruptive_inframe_deletion
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- hypoplasminogenemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: ClinGen, Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
- angioedema, hereditary, 4Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 1 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000301.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLG | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.693_695delGAA | p.Lys231del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 7 of 19 | ENSP00000308938.9 | P00747 | ||
| PLG | c.693_695delGAA | p.Lys231del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 7 of 21 | ENSP00000542497.1 | ||||
| PLG | c.693_695delGAA | p.Lys231del | disruptive_inframe_deletion | Exon 7 of 19 | ENSP00000542494.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000963 AC: 14AN: 1454310Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000829 AC XY: 6AN XY: 724066 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152202Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74352 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at