NM_000302.4:c.135G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 2P and 11B. PM2BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7

The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):c.135G>A(p.Lys45Lys) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000533 in 1,613,812 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000013 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000057 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

PLOD1
NM_000302.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.97

Publications

0 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PLOD1 (HGNC:9081): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1) Lysyl hydroxylase is a membrane-bound homodimeric protein localized to the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

PLOD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P

PLOD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

PM2

Very rare variant in population databases, with high coverage;

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.45).

BP6

Variant 1-11948034-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-11948034-G-A is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 529356.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.97 with no splicing effect.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000302.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected	Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein	UniProt
	PLOD1	NM_000302.4	MANE Select	c.135G>A	p.Lys45Lys	synonymous	Exon 2 of 19	NP_000293.2
	PLOD1	NM_001316320.2		c.276G>A	p.Lys92Lys	synonymous	Exon 3 of 20	NP_001303249.1

Ensembl Transcripts

Gene	Transcript	Tags	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon Rank	Protein
PLOD1	ENST00000196061.5	TSL:1 MANE Select	c.135G>A	p.Lys45Lys	synonymous	Exon 2 of 19	ENSP00000196061.4
PLOD1	ENST00000429000.6	TSL:5	c.135G>A	p.Lys45Lys	synonymous	Exon 2 of 8	ENSP00000405372.1
PLOD1	ENST00000449038.5	TSL:5	c.276G>A	p.Lys92Lys	synonymous	Exon 3 of 6	ENSP00000414443.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000398

AC:

AN:

251494

AF XY:

0.0000441

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000879

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000575

AC:

AN:

1461656

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000578

AC XY:

AN XY:

727146

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53416

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000747

AC:

AN:

1111796

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000166

AC:

AN:

60392

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.0000131

AC:

AN:

152156

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000135

AC XY:

AN XY:

74338

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41430

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15260

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5196

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10614

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

316

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68038

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2088

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.575

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000282

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000151

EpiCase

AF:

0.000109

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:1

Jul 09, 2025

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Jul 30, 2024

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

PLOD1-related disorder

Benign:1

Apr 27, 2022

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).

not provided

Benign:1

Apr 17, 2019

GeneDx

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1

Benign:1

Aug 08, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.45

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.67

PhyloP100

2.0

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.6

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Variant Effect in Transcripts

RefSeq Transcripts

Ensembl Transcripts

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over