NM_000302.4:c.1864C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points: 6P and 0B. PM2PP3_Strong
The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):c.1864C>T(p.Pro622Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000616 in 1,461,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P622L) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000302.4 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000302.4. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLOD1 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1864C>T | p.Pro622Ser | missense | Exon 17 of 19 | ENSP00000196061.4 | Q02809-1 | ||
| PLOD1 | c.2008C>T | p.Pro670Ser | missense | Exon 18 of 20 | ENSP00000524078.1 | ||||
| PLOD1 | c.1951C>T | p.Pro651Ser | missense | Exon 18 of 20 | ENSP00000524090.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 27
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000239 AC: 6AN: 250686 AF XY: 0.0000221 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000616 AC: 9AN: 1461266Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000550 AC XY: 4AN XY: 726938 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 27
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at