NM_000302.4:c.535G>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points: 1P and 16B. PP3BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS2

The NM_000302.4(PLOD1):c.535G>T(p.Asp179Tyr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00023 in 1,614,024 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. D179H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00032 ( 1 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00022 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

PLOD1
NM_000302.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:2

Conservation

PhyloP100: 9.98

Publications

3 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

PLOD1 (HGNC:9081): (procollagen-lysine,2-oxoglutarate 5-dioxygenase 1) Lysyl hydroxylase is a membrane-bound homodimeric protein localized to the cisternae of the endoplasmic reticulum. The enzyme (cofactors iron and ascorbate) catalyzes the hydroxylation of lysyl residues in collagen-like peptides. The resultant hydroxylysyl groups are attachment sites for carbohydrates in collagen and thus are critical for the stability of intermolecular crosslinks. Some patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI have deficiencies in lysyl hydroxylase activity. Two transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2015]

PLOD1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, Orphanet, PanelApp Australia, G2P

PLOD1 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -15 ACMG points.

PP3

Multiple lines of computational evidence support a deleterious effect 10: AlphaMissense, BayesDel_noAF, Cadd, Eigen, FATHMM_MKL, MutationAssessor, phyloP100way_vertebrate, PROVEAN, REVEL, REVEL [when max_spliceai, M_CAP, MetaRNN, MutationTaster was below the threshold]

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.027671605).

BP6

Variant 1-11952691-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-11952691-G-T is described in ClinVar as Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 459822.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAdExome4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
PLOD1	NM_000302.4 link	c.535G>T	p.Asp179Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 19	ENST00000196061.5	NP_000293.2	Q02809-1
PLOD1	NM_001316320.2 link	c.676G>T	p.Asp226Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 6 of 20		NP_001303249.1	Q02809-2

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
PLOD1	ENST00000196061.5 link	c.535G>T	p.Asp179Tyr	missense_variant	Exon 5 of 19	1	NM_000302.4	ENSP00000196061.4		Q02809-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152190

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00424

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000529

AC:

133

AN:

251410

AF XY:

0.000478

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00513

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00130

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000222

AC:

324

AN:

1461716

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000197

AC XY:

143

AN XY:

727180

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

33474

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26134

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86242

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00532

AC:

284

AN:

53392

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000180

AC:

AN:

1111902

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000331

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.485

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000315

AC:

AN:

152308

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000443

AC XY:

AN XY:

74486

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

41576

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

15282

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5188

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00424

AC:

AN:

10616

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000441

AC:

AN:

68024

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.483

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.0000824

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.0000189

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.000116

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.000535

AC:

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:2

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Apr 24, 2023

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, kyphoscoliotic type 1

Benign:1

Dec 05, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Pathogenic

0.80

BayesDel_addAF

Uncertain

0.14

BayesDel_noAF

Pathogenic

0.20

CADD

Pathogenic

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

0.99

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.50

D;D

Eigen

Pathogenic

0.89

Eigen_PC

Pathogenic

0.80

FATHMM_MKL

Pathogenic

0.97

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;D

M_CAP

Benign

0.072

MetaRNN

Benign

0.028

T;T

MetaSVM

Benign

-0.31

MutationAssessor

Pathogenic

3.1

.;M

PhyloP100

PrimateAI

Uncertain

0.77

PROVEAN

Pathogenic

-7.9

D;D

REVEL

Pathogenic

0.73

Sift

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Sift4G

Pathogenic

0.0

D;D

Polyphen

1.0

.;D

Vest4

0.96

MVP

0.74

MPC

0.87

ClinPred

0.31

GERP RS

4.6

Varity_R

0.96

gMVP

0.98

Mutation Taster

=83/17

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over