NM_000379.4:c.1885G>A

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2

The NM_000379.4(XDH):c.1885G>A(p.Val629Ile) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000611 in 1,614,172 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 7 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/21 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V629F) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 2 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00033 ( 5 hom. )

Consequence

XDH
NM_000379.4 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:5

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.95

Publications

7 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

XDH (HGNC:12805): (xanthine dehydrogenase) Xanthine dehydrogenase belongs to the group of molybdenum-containing hydroxylases involved in the oxidative metabolism of purines. The encoded protein has been identified as a moonlighting protein based on its ability to perform mechanistically distinct functions. Xanthine dehydrogenase can be converted to xanthine oxidase by reversible sulfhydryl oxidation or by irreversible proteolytic modification. Defects in xanthine dehydrogenase cause xanthinuria, may contribute to adult respiratory stress syndrome, and may potentiate influenza infection through an oxygen metabolite-dependent mechanism. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2014]

XDH Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

xanthinuria type I
Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG, MODERATE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Ambry Genetics

XDH links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.009343594).

BP6

Variant 2-31370450-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-31370450-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 718983.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0033 (502/152298) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.0115 (479/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0107. There are 2 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 231 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 2 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein
XDH	NM_000379.4 link	c.1885G>A	p.Val629Ile	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 36	ENST00000379416.4	NP_000370.2
XDH	XM_011533095.3 link	c.1882G>A	p.Val628Ile	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 36		XP_011531397.1
XDH	XM_011533096.3 link	c.1885G>A	p.Val629Ile	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 29		XP_011531398.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
XDH	ENST00000379416.4 link	c.1885G>A	p.Val629Ile	missense_variant	Exon 18 of 36	1	NM_000379.4	ENSP00000368727.3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00331

AC:

504

AN:

152180

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0116

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00111

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.000207

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0000942

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00316

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000819

AC:

206

AN:

251390

AF XY:

0.000648

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.0105

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.000665

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000176

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000489

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000331

AC:

484

AN:

1461874

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000272

AC XY:

198

AN XY:

727240

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0108

AC:

363

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000648

AC:

AN:

44724

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000220

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000374

AC:

AN:

53420

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000347

AC:

AN:

5768

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000306

AC:

AN:

1111996

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000580

AC:

AN:

60396

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.470

Heterozygous variant carriers

111

139

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00330

AC:

502

AN:

152298

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00310

AC XY:

231

AN XY:

74480

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0115

AC:

479

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00111

AC:

AN:

15300

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3468

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5182

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000207

AC:

AN:

4826

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000942

AC:

AN:

10618

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00340

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68022

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2112

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.502

Heterozygous variant carriers

120

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Genome Hom

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000560

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00368

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.0109

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.00101

AC:

122

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:5

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Benign:2

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:not provided

- -

Mar 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

XDH: BP4, BS1 -

Hereditary xanthinuria type 1

Benign:2

Dec 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Xanthinuria type II

Benign:1

Dec 04, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.081

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.59

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.61

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Uncertain

1.0

DEOGEN2

Benign

0.012

Eigen

Uncertain

0.26

Eigen_PC

Uncertain

0.38

FATHMM_MKL

Uncertain

0.77

LIST_S2

Benign

0.76

MetaRNN

Benign

0.0093

MetaSVM

Benign

-1.1

MutationAssessor

Benign

1.1

PhyloP100

1.9

PrimateAI

Benign

0.39

PROVEAN

Benign

-0.14

REVEL

Benign

0.11

Sift

Benign

0.20

Sift4G

Benign

0.35

Polyphen

0.42

Vest4

0.35

MVP

0.40

MPC

0.13

ClinPred

0.023

GERP RS

6.2

Varity_R

0.26

gMVP

0.32

Mutation Taster

=97/3

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over