NM_000393.5:c.403-16T>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.403-16T>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0102 in 1,613,276 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 563 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000393.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Ehlers-Danlos syndromeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
 - Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic typeInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
 - Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL5A2 | NM_000393.5  | c.403-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 53 | ENST00000374866.9 | NP_000384.2 | ||
| COL5A2 | XM_011510573.4  | c.265-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 8 of 56 | XP_011508875.1 | |||
| COL5A2 | XM_047443251.1  | c.265-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 10 of 58 | XP_047299207.1 | |||
| COL5A2 | XM_047443252.1  | c.265-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 9 of 57 | XP_047299208.1 | 
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL5A2 | ENST00000374866.9  | c.403-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 53 | 1 | NM_000393.5 | ENSP00000364000.3 | |||
| COL5A2 | ENST00000618828.1  | c.-228-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 46 | 5 | ENSP00000482184.1 | ||||
| COL5A2 | ENST00000649966.1  | c.265-16T>A | intron_variant | Intron 5 of 10 | ENSP00000496785.1 | 
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.0147  AC: 2240AN: 152144Hom.:  41  Cov.: 32 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.0222  AC: 5590AN: 251380 AF XY:  0.0239   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.00970  AC: 14167AN: 1461014Hom.:  519  Cov.: 30 AF XY:  0.0116  AC XY: 8439AN XY: 726868 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.0148  AC: 2251AN: 152262Hom.:  44  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.0163  AC XY: 1212AN XY: 74446 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified    Benign:2 
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided    Benign:2 
Variant summary: The COL5A2 c.403-16T>A variant involves the alteration of a non-conserved intronic nucleotide. One in silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 5/5 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. However, these predictions have yet to be confirmed by functional studies. The variant of interest has been observed in a large, broad control population, ExAC, in 2692/120714 control chromosomes (91 homozygotes) at a frequency of 0.0223006, which is approximately 3568 times the estimated maximal expected allele frequency of a pathogenic COL5A2 variant (0.0000063), suggesting this variant is likely a benign polymorphism. In addition, multiple clinical diagnostic laboratories/reputable databases classified this variant as benign. The variant of interest has not, to our knowledge, been reported in affected individuals via publications nor evaluated for functional impact by in vivo/vitro studies. Taken together, this variant is classified as benign. -
- -
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1    Benign:1 
- -
Computational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at