NM_000393.5:c.4392T>C

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points: 0P and 14B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS1BS2

The NM_000393.5(COL5A2):c.4392T>C(p.Tyr1464Tyr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00039 in 1,614,012 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00026 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00040 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

COL5A2
NM_000393.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.682

Publications

1 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

COL5A2 (HGNC:2210): (collagen type V alpha 2 chain) This gene encodes an alpha chain for one of the low abundance fibrillar collagens. Fibrillar collagen molecules are trimers that can be composed of one or more types of alpha chains. Type V collagen is found in tissues containing type I collagen and appears to regulate the assembly of heterotypic fibers composed of both type I and type V collagen. This gene product is closely related to type XI collagen and it is possible that the collagen chains of types V and XI constitute a single collagen type with tissue-specific chain combinations. Mutations in this gene are associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, types I and II. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

COL5A2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, ClinGen
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp

COL5A2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -14 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.62).

BP6

Variant 2-189034178-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr2-189034178-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 136958.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.682 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000256 (39/152326) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000544 (37/68014). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000405. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 16 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 39 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
COL5A2	NM_000393.5 link	c.4392T>C	p.Tyr1464Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 54 of 54	ENST00000374866.9	NP_000384.2	P05997
COL5A2	XM_011510573.4 link	c.4254T>C	p.Tyr1418Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 57 of 57		XP_011508875.1
COL5A2	XM_047443251.1 link	c.4254T>C	p.Tyr1418Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 59 of 59		XP_047299207.1
COL5A2	XM_047443252.1 link	c.4254T>C	p.Tyr1418Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 58 of 58		XP_047299208.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
COL5A2	ENST00000374866.9 link	c.4392T>C	p.Tyr1464Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 54 of 54	1	NM_000393.5	ENSP00000364000.3		P05997
COL5A2	ENST00000618828.1 link	c.3231T>C	p.Tyr1077Tyr	synonymous_variant	Exon 47 of 47	5		ENSP00000482184.1		A0A087WYX9

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

152208

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.0000241

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000654

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000544

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.000227

AC:

AN:

251058

AF XY:

0.000177

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0000462

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000467

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000404

AC:

591

AN:

1461686

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000363

AC XY:

264

AN XY:

727136

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000598

AC:

AN:

33470

American (AMR)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

44668

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

26122

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

39694

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

86256

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.0000187

AC:

AN:

53412

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5766

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000515

AC:

573

AN:

1111910

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000248

AC:

AN:

60388

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.488

Heterozygous variant carriers

123

154

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

120

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000256

AC:

AN:

152326

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000215

AC XY:

AN XY:

74498

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.0000241

AC:

AN:

41564

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000654

AC:

AN:

15302

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5192

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4832

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10628

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000544

AC:

AN:

68014

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2116

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.513

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000450

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000230

EpiCase

AF:

0.000218

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity

Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:8

Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:3

Jan 01, 2024

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 23, 2014

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type 7A

Uncertain:1

Jun 14, 2016

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissection

Benign:1

Aug 09, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2019

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 2

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

not provided

Benign:1

Nov 01, 2023

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

COL5A2: BP4, BP7 -

Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, classic type, 1

Benign:1

Jan 26, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.62

CADD

Benign

1.0

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.30

PhyloP100

0.68

Mutation Taster

=98/2

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over