NM_000426.4:c.6237G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000426.4(LAMA2):​c.6237G>A​(p.Thr2079Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.163 in 1,612,810 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 21,946 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2159 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.16 ( 19787 hom. )

Consequence

LAMA2
NM_000426.4 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.70

Publications

16 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LAMA2 (HGNC:6482): (laminin subunit alpha 2) Laminin, an extracellular protein, is a major component of the basement membrane. It is thought to mediate the attachment, migration, and organization of cells into tissues during embryonic development by interacting with other extracellular matrix components. It is composed of three subunits, alpha, beta, and gamma, which are bound to each other by disulfide bonds into a cross-shaped molecule. This gene encodes the alpha 2 chain, which constitutes one of the subunits of laminin 2 (merosin) and laminin 4 (s-merosin). Mutations in this gene have been identified as the cause of congenital merosin-deficient muscular dystrophy. Two transcript variants encoding different proteins have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
LAMA2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital merosin-deficient muscular dystrophy 1A
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health, G2P
  • LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • muscular dystrophy, limb-girdle, autosomal recessive 23
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.56).
BP6
Variant 6-129440967-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr6-129440967-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 92975.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.7 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (EAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.199 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LAMA2NM_000426.4 linkc.6237G>A p.Thr2079Thr synonymous_variant Exon 43 of 65 ENST00000421865.3 NP_000417.3
LAMA2NM_001079823.2 linkc.6237G>A p.Thr2079Thr synonymous_variant Exon 43 of 64 NP_001073291.2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LAMA2ENST00000421865.3 linkc.6237G>A p.Thr2079Thr synonymous_variant Exon 43 of 65 5 NM_000426.4 ENSP00000400365.2 P24043
LAMA2ENST00000618192.5 linkc.6501G>A p.Thr2167Thr synonymous_variant Exon 44 of 66 5 ENSP00000480802.2 A0A087WX80
LAMA2ENST00000617695.5 linkc.6237G>A p.Thr2079Thr synonymous_variant Exon 43 of 64 5 ENSP00000481744.2 A0A087WYF1
ENSG00000226149ENST00000665046.1 linkn.1261C>T non_coding_transcript_exon_variant Exon 10 of 10

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.163
AC:
24773
AN:
152000
Hom.:
2159
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.259
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.199
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.115
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.209
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.179
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.208
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.133
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.161
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.163
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.173
AC:
43412
AN:
250786
AF XY:
0.171
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.136
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.220
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.112
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.217
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.155
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.171
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.163
AC:
237679
AN:
1460692
Hom.:
19787
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.163
AC XY:
118245
AN XY:
726738
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.133
AC:
4439
AN:
33460
American (AMR)
AF:
0.219
AC:
9773
AN:
44678
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.108
AC:
2823
AN:
26122
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.198
AC:
7832
AN:
39646
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.170
AC:
14648
AN:
86230
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.210
AC:
11191
AN:
53406
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.165
AC:
951
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.158
AC:
175898
AN:
1111018
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.168
AC:
10124
AN:
60370
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10322
20644
30966
41288
51610
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
6410
12820
19230
25640
32050
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.163
AC:
24777
AN:
152118
Hom.:
2159
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.167
AC XY:
12387
AN XY:
74362
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.136
AC:
5628
AN:
41494
American (AMR)
AF:
0.199
AC:
3048
AN:
15298
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.115
AC:
399
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.209
AC:
1083
AN:
5170
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.179
AC:
859
AN:
4804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.208
AC:
2197
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.143
AC:
42
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.161
AC:
10946
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.160
AC:
339
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1085
2170
3255
4340
5425
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
272
544
816
1088
1360
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.153
Hom.:
3294
Bravo
AF:
0.161
Asia WGS
AF:
0.175
AC:
609
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.155
EpiControl
AF:
0.158

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 20, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 15, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 05, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

LAMA2-related muscular dystrophy Benign:1
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital muscular dystrophy due to partial LAMA2 deficiency Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.56
CADD
Benign
8.4
DANN
Benign
0.62
PhyloP100
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs2297738; hg19: chr6-129762112; COSMIC: COSV70344022; COSMIC: COSV70344022; API