NM_000501.4:c.196+194G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000501.4(ELN):c.196+194G>A variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0841 in 731,356 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,659 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000501.4 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- cutis laxa, autosomal dominant 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
- supravalvular aortic stenosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- autosomal dominant cutis laxaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- familial thoracic aortic aneurysm and aortic dissectionInheritance: AD Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.113 AC: 17135AN: 152032Hom.: 1329 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0766 AC: 44385AN: 579206Hom.: 2325 Cov.: 7 AF XY: 0.0772 AC XY: 23455AN XY: 303808 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.113 AC: 17150AN: 152150Hom.: 1334 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.115 AC XY: 8575AN XY: 74374 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Benign:2
- -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at