NM_000525.4:c.808C>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2

The NM_000525.4(KCNJ11):​c.808C>G​(p.Leu270Val) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0402 in 1,614,186 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 1,728 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/19 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L270M) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.037 ( 175 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.041 ( 1553 hom. )

Consequence

KCNJ11
NM_000525.4 missense

Scores

3
13

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:18

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.14

Publications

42 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
KCNJ11 (HGNC:6257): (potassium inwardly rectifying channel subfamily J member 11) Potassium channels are present in most mammalian cells, where they participate in a wide range of physiologic responses. The protein encoded by this gene is an integral membrane protein and inward-rectifier type potassium channel. The encoded protein, which has a greater tendency to allow potassium to flow into a cell rather than out of a cell, is controlled by G-proteins and is found associated with the sulfonylurea receptor SUR. Mutations in this gene are a cause of familial persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia of infancy (PHHI), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by unregulated insulin secretion. Defects in this gene may also contribute to autosomal dominant non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II (NIDDM), transient neonatal diabetes mellitus type 3 (TNDM3), and permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus (PNDM). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants that encode different protein isoforms have been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
KCNJ11 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 3
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Genomics England PanelApp, G2P
  • monogenic diabetes
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
  • hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 2
    Inheritance: AR, AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Myriad Women’s Health, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
  • diabetes mellitus, noninsulin-dependent
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • diabetes mellitus, permanent neonatal 2
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 13
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
  • autosomal dominant hyperinsulinism due to Kir6.2 deficiency
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • DEND syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • intermediate DEND syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • maturity-onset diabetes of the young
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • transient neonatal diabetes mellitus
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • autosomal recessive hyperinsulinism due to Kir6.2 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • diazoxide-resistant focal hyperinsulinism due to Kir6.2 deficiency
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.001799047).
BP6
Variant 11-17387284-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-17387284-G-C is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 158685.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0373 (5683/152306) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.0452 (3072/68022). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0438. There are 175 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 2957 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 175 AD,AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
KCNJ11NM_000525.4 linkc.808C>G p.Leu270Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 ENST00000339994.5 NP_000516.3 Q14654-1B2RC52
KCNJ11NM_001166290.2 linkc.547C>G p.Leu183Val missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 NP_001159762.1 Q14654-2A0A804HHV7
KCNJ11NM_001377296.1 linkc.547C>G p.Leu183Val missense_variant Exon 3 of 3 NP_001364225.1
KCNJ11NM_001377297.1 linkc.547C>G p.Leu183Val missense_variant Exon 2 of 2 NP_001364226.1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
KCNJ11ENST00000339994.5 linkc.808C>G p.Leu270Val missense_variant Exon 1 of 1 6 NM_000525.4 ENSP00000345708.4 Q14654-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0373
AC:
5683
AN:
152188
Hom.:
174
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00796
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.0636
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0414
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0599
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00786
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.114
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0759
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0452
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0522
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0405
AC:
10167
AN:
251334
AF XY:
0.0407
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00640
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0298
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0678
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000217
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.114
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0462
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0538
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0405
AC:
59210
AN:
1461880
Hom.:
1553
Cov.:
69
AF XY:
0.0402
AC XY:
29248
AN XY:
727242
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00660
AC:
221
AN:
33480
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0301
AC:
1348
AN:
44724
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0613
AC:
1603
AN:
26136
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0000252
AC:
1
AN:
39700
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0109
AC:
942
AN:
86256
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.108
AC:
5747
AN:
53414
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0411
AC:
237
AN:
5768
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0419
AC:
46623
AN:
1112008
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0412
AC:
2488
AN:
60394
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.484
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3765
7530
11296
15061
18826
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
1642
3284
4926
6568
8210
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0373
AC:
5683
AN:
152306
Hom.:
175
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0397
AC XY:
2957
AN XY:
74466
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00791
AC:
329
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0413
AC:
632
AN:
15304
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0599
AC:
208
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5174
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00807
AC:
39
AN:
4830
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.114
AC:
1212
AN:
10608
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0782
AC:
23
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0452
AC:
3072
AN:
68022
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0521
AC:
110
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
274
547
821
1094
1368
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
70
140
210
280
350
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0294
Hom.:
33
Bravo
AF:
0.0316
TwinsUK
AF:
0.0418
AC:
155
ALSPAC
AF:
0.0376
AC:
145
ESP6500AA
AF:
0.00705
AC:
31
ESP6500EA
AF:
0.0469
AC:
403
ExAC
AF:
0.0374
AC:
4537
Asia WGS
AF:
0.00664
AC:
23
AN:
3478
EpiCase
AF:
0.0496
EpiControl
AF:
0.0533

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:18
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 25, 2016
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 08, 2013
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Sep 04, 2018
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 25972930) -

Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia, familial, 2 Benign:3
May 19, 2017
Athena Diagnostics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 01, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Diabetes mellitus, transient neonatal, 3 Benign:2
Jul 01, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Maturity onset diabetes mellitus in young Uncertain:1
-
Clinical Genomics, Uppaluri K&H Personalized Medicine Clinic
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

Mutations in the KCNJ11 gene can cause decreased production and secretion of insulin. This can lead to MODY which is responsive to oral sulfonylureas. However, the variant rs1800467 might not pose increased sensitivity to Type II Diabetes by itself but in combination with other variants in KCNJ11 or INS and HNF1A increase predisposition to insulin resistance. -

Diabetes mellitus, permanent neonatal 2 Benign:1
Jul 01, 2021
Pars Genome Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Monogenic diabetes Benign:1
Feb 22, 2019
Personalized Diabetes Medicine Program, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:research

ACMG criteria: BA1 (4% overall MAF in gnomAD, 11% MAF in EF, 6.8% in AJ), BS2 (936 cases and 916 controls in T2DM): benign (Revel score 0.344 + PP3 (4 predictors) + BP4 (5 predictors): conflicing evidence, not using; no longer using BP6) -

Permanent neonatal diabetes mellitus Benign:1
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 13 Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.081
BayesDel_addAF
Benign
-0.27
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.12
CADD
Benign
18
DANN
Benign
0.95
Eigen
Benign
-0.17
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.011
FATHMM_MKL
Uncertain
0.80
D
LIST_S2
Uncertain
0.91
D;.
MetaRNN
Benign
0.0018
T;T
MetaSVM
Benign
-0.31
T
PhyloP100
1.1
PrimateAI
Benign
0.46
T
PROVEAN
Benign
-0.90
N;N
REVEL
Uncertain
0.34
Sift
Benign
0.088
T;T
Sift4G
Benign
0.42
T;T
Vest4
0.044
MPC
0.63
ClinPred
0.0024
T
GERP RS
5.4
gMVP
0.54
Mutation Taster
=94/6
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1800467; hg19: chr11-17408831; COSMIC: COSV60594359; COSMIC: COSV60594359; API