NM_000532.5:c.1402G>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM2PP2PP3_Strong
The NM_000532.5(PCCB):c.1402G>T(p.Ala468Ser) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000137 in 1,460,770 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a pathogenic outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A468T) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000532.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- propionic acidemiaInheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Myriad Women’s Health, ClinGen, G2P, Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Laboratory for Molecular Medicine
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000532.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCCB | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.1402G>T | p.Ala468Ser | missense | Exon 14 of 15 | ENSP00000251654.4 | P05166-1 | ||
| PCCB | TSL:1 | c.1402G>T | p.Ala468Ser | missense | Exon 14 of 16 | ENSP00000417549.1 | E9PDR0 | ||
| PCCB | TSL:1 | c.885-5519G>T | intron | N/A | ENSP00000420759.1 | E7ENC1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 33
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000119 AC: 3AN: 251050 AF XY: 0.00000737 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000137 AC: 2AN: 1460770Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 726816 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 33
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at