NM_000539.3:c.448G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points: 7P and 0B. PM1PM2PM5PP2
The NM_000539.3(RHO):c.448G>C(p.Glu150Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000186 in 1,614,154 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. E150K) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000539.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- congenital stationary night blindness autosomal dominant 1Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
 - retinitis pigmentosa 4Inheritance: AD, AR, SD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics
 - congenital stationary night blindnessInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 - retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
 - fundus albipunctatusInheritance: Unknown Classification: LIMITED Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
 
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_pathogenic. The variant received 7 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes   AF:  0.00000657  AC: 1AN: 152264Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 show subpopulations 
GnomAD2 exomes  AF:  0.0000159  AC: 4AN: 251486 AF XY:  0.00000736   show subpopulations 
GnomAD4 exome  AF:  0.00000137  AC: 2AN: 1461890Hom.:  0  Cov.: 32 AF XY:  0.00  AC XY: 0AN XY: 727248 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome   AF:  0.00000657  AC: 1AN: 152264Hom.:  0  Cov.: 33 AF XY:  0.0000134  AC XY: 1AN XY: 74386 show subpopulations 
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source: 
Splicing
 Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at