NM_000546.6:c.1129A>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points: 0P and 5B. BP4_StrongBP6

The NM_000546.6(TP53):​c.1129A>C​(p.Thr377Pro) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. T377I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000046 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000067 ( 0 hom. )
Failed GnomAD Quality Control

Consequence

TP53
NM_000546.6 missense

Scores

1
3
15

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:1B:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.464

Publications

32 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TP53 (HGNC:11998): (tumor protein p53) This gene encodes a tumor suppressor protein containing transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and oligomerization domains. The encoded protein responds to diverse cellular stresses to regulate expression of target genes, thereby inducing cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, senescence, DNA repair, or changes in metabolism. Mutations in this gene are associated with a variety of human cancers, including hereditary cancers such as Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Alternative splicing of this gene and the use of alternate promoters result in multiple transcript variants and isoforms. Additional isoforms have also been shown to result from the use of alternate translation initiation codons from identical transcript variants (PMIDs: 12032546, 20937277). [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2016]
TP53 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • breast cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Orphanet
  • Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp
  • adrenocortical carcinoma, hereditary
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • sarcoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • bone marrow failure syndrome 5
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • colorectal cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Ambry Genetics
  • choroid plexus carcinoma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -5 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.010908842).
BP6
Variant 17-7669662-T-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-7669662-T-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 975959.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TP53NM_000546.6 linkc.1129A>C p.Thr377Pro missense_variant Exon 11 of 11 ENST00000269305.9 NP_000537.3 P04637-1K7PPA8Q53GA5

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TP53ENST00000269305.9 linkc.1129A>C p.Thr377Pro missense_variant Exon 11 of 11 1 NM_000546.6 ENSP00000269305.4 P04637-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000530
AC:
8
AN:
150890
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000660
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.000290
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.000196
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000209
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000593
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000287
AC:
71
AN:
247380
AF XY:
0.000231
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000496
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.000399
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.000109
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000454
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000366
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00
GnomAD4 exome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.0000672
AC:
98
AN:
1458674
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.0000689
AC XY:
50
AN XY:
725644
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Exomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000897
AC:
3
AN:
33438
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000224
AC:
1
AN:
44710
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000115
AC:
3
AN:
26082
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39696
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000698
AC:
6
AN:
86020
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000230
AC:
12
AN:
52090
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0107
AC:
51
AN:
4766
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000108
AC:
12
AN:
1111596
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000166
AC:
10
AN:
60276
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD4 Exomes is highly skewed from 0.5 (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.282
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
8
16
24
32
40
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
4
8
12
16
20
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
Data not reliable, filtered out with message: AS_VQSR
AF:
0.0000464
AC:
7
AN:
150988
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.0000678
AC XY:
5
AN XY:
73712
show subpopulations
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41246
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000659
AC:
1
AN:
15170
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.000290
AC:
1
AN:
3444
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5088
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.000209
AC:
1
AN:
4784
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10538
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
284
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000593
AC:
4
AN:
67428
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2098
⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5. (p-value = 0), which strongly suggests a high chance of mosaicism in these individuals.
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.263
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
4
5
6
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Alfa
AF:
0.0000412
Hom.:
0
ExAC
AF:
0.000725
AC:
88

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1Benign:1
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Li-Fraumeni syndrome 1 Uncertain:1
Mar 06, 2018
Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
Apr 12, 2024
Lupski Lab, Baylor-Hopkins CMG, Baylor College of Medicine
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

Each variant was annotated with functional scores from MAVE data which was translated into functional evidence codes. All other evidence codes and combining criteria were adhered to as closely as possible based on the ClinGen VCEP (Variant Curation Expert Panel) gene-specific recommendations. See Supplemental Figure 34 of final paper (Supp Fig. 28 in preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690) for a table to see which lines of evidence we did not have data for. The ClinGen VCEPs are highly regarded as the gold-standard for gene-specific variant curation and are developed after extensive evaluation of the evidence by clinical and scientific experts for the particular gene to classify genomic variants on a spectrum from pathogenic to benign using the 2015 ACMG/AMP Variant Interpretation Guidelines as a backbone (PMID: 25741868). Reclassification of these VUS variants from gnomAD or All of Us focused only on variants originally prescribed as VUS in ClinVar. To ensure reproducibility, transparency, and increased throughput, all the procedures for annotating variants and assigning evidence codes were codified using Python. All code has been made freely available and is linked in the Code Availability section and all reclassified variants with evidence codes used can be found in Tables S18-19 (preprint: doi:10.1101/2024.04.11.24305690). For the MAVE data, the clinical curation and clinical strength assignment as per the ClinGen recommendations in Brnich et al. (2020) (PMID: 31892348) for or against pathogenicity or benignity of each of these MAVE datasets utilized in this study were previously published in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697).For TP53, we used the output of the Naïve Bayes classifier that synthesized data from four different TP53 MAVEs in Fayer et al. (2021) (PMID: 34793697). If the classifier predicted a variant to be "Functionally abnormal," the variant was assigned PS3 evidence and no BS3 evidence. If a variant was predicted to be "Functionally normal," BS3_moderate evidence was used with no PS3 evidence. This variant GRCh37:17:7572980:T>G was assigned evidence codes ['BS3_Moderate', 'BP4'] and an overall classification of Likely Benign -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
AlphaMissense
Benign
0.057
BayesDel_addAF
Uncertain
0.065
T
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.14
CADD
Benign
17
DANN
Benign
0.94
DEOGEN2
Benign
0.41
.;.;.;T;.;T;.;.
Eigen
Benign
-0.63
Eigen_PC
Benign
-0.48
FATHMM_MKL
Benign
0.64
D
LIST_S2
Benign
0.60
T;T;.;.;.;T;T;T
M_CAP
Pathogenic
0.31
D
MetaRNN
Benign
0.011
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
MetaSVM
Uncertain
0.42
D
MutationAssessor
Benign
1.2
.;.;.;L;.;L;.;.
PhyloP100
0.46
PrimateAI
Benign
0.37
T
PROVEAN
Benign
2.8
.;.;.;N;.;N;.;.
REVEL
Uncertain
0.35
Sift
Benign
0.44
.;.;.;T;.;T;.;.
Sift4G
Benign
1.0
T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T
Polyphen
0.0020
.;.;.;B;.;B;.;.
Vest4
0.097
MVP
0.77
MPC
2.0
ClinPred
0.020
T
GERP RS
1.9
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.1
Varity_R
0.22
gMVP
0.22
Mutation Taster
=40/60
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.060
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs774269719; hg19: chr17-7572980; COSMIC: COSV52716766; COSMIC: COSV52716766; API