NM_000548.5:c.1593C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1593C>T(p.Ile531Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000511 in 1,613,510 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. I531I) has been classified as Likely benign.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00062 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.00050 ( 6 hom. )

Consequence

TSC2
NM_000548.5 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:18O:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: -4.10

Publications

9 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

TSC2 (HGNC:12363): (TSC complex subunit 2) This gene is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the growth inhibitory protein tuberin. Tuberin interacts with hamartin to form the TSC protein complex which functions in the control of cell growth. This TSC protein complex negatively regulates mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which is a major regulator of anabolic cell growth. Mutations in this gene have been associated with tuberous sclerosis and lymphangioleiomyomatosis. [provided by RefSeq, May 2022]

TSC2 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

tuberous sclerosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
tuberous sclerosis 2
Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
lymphangioleiomyomatosis
Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
tuberous sclerosis complex
Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

TSC2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.57).

BP6

Variant 16-2064421-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2064421-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 49163.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-4.1 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population eas. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000624 (95/152356) while in subpopulation EAS AF = 0.0135 (70/5186). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.011. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 58 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 95 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
TSC2	NM_000548.5 link	c.1593C>T	p.Ile531Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 42	ENST00000219476.9	NP_000539.2	P49815-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
TSC2	ENST00000219476.9 link	c.1593C>T	p.Ile531Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 15 of 42	5	NM_000548.5	ENSP00000219476.3		P49815-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000624

AC:

AN:

152238

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000193

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.000196

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00173

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.0135

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000103

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.000478

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.00107

AC:

268

AN:

251020

AF XY:

0.000950

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000308

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000578

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00159

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0125

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.0000441

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00114

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.000500

AC:

730

AN:

1461154

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000501

AC XY:

364

AN XY:

726856

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000179

AC:

AN:

33478

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000447

AC:

AN:

44722

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00126

AC:

AN:

26136

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0151

AC:

601

AN:

39700

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.000162

AC:

AN:

86244

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

52846

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5678

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000315

AC:

AN:

1111988

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000646

AC:

AN:

60362

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.490

Heterozygous variant carriers

140

186

233

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Exome Hom

Variant carriers

100

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000624

AC:

AN:

152356

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000778

AC XY:

AN XY:

74504

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000192

AC:

AN:

41586

American (AMR)

AF:

0.000196

AC:

AN:

15308

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00173

AC:

AN:

3472

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0135

AC:

AN:

5186

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4830

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10624

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.000103

AC:

AN:

68032

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.000473

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.496

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000264

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000642

Asia WGS

AF:

0.00202

AC:

AN:

3478

EpiCase

AF:

0.00

EpiControl

AF:

0.000119

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:18Other:1

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:5

Oct 23, 2013

GeneDx

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Nov 30, 2021

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Oct 16, 2023

Athena Diagnostics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:5

Nov 07, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 14, 2025

Myriad Genetics, Inc.

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered benign. This variant is a silent/synonymous amino acid change and it is not expected to impact splicing. -

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 10, 2020

Division of Genomic Medicine, Department of Advanced Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Kanazawa Medical University

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Tuberous sclerosis syndrome

Benign:3Other:1

Sep 07, 2022

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

May 03, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). No publications were found based on this search. Allele frequency data from public databases allowed determination this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -

Tuberous sclerosis database (TSC2)

Significance:not provided

Review Status:no classification provided

Collection Method:curation

- -

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Lymphangiomyomatosis;C1846385:Isolated focal cortical dysplasia type II;C1860707:Tuberous sclerosis 2

Benign:2

Aug 14, 2024

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 24, 2021

Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics

Significance:Benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:2

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 01, 2024

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

TSC2: BP4, BP7, BS1 -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome

Benign:1

Dec 01, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Likely benign

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.57

CADD

Benign

0.47

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.79

PhyloP100

-4.1

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.7

Mutation Taster

=100/0

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over