NM_000548.5:c.1600-14C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.1600-14C>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0621 in 1,610,218 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 3,510 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 intron
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | MANE | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | c.1600-14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 15 of 41 | ENST00000219476.9 | NP_000539.2 |
Ensembl
| Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | c.1600-14C>T | intron_variant | Intron 15 of 41 | 5 | NM_000548.5 | ENSP00000219476.3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0483 AC: 7333AN: 151808Hom.: 249 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0565 AC: 14111AN: 249674 AF XY: 0.0589 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0635 AC: 92601AN: 1458296Hom.: 3260 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0636 AC XY: 46162AN XY: 725560 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0483 AC: 7333AN: 151922Hom.: 250 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0496 AC XY: 3680AN XY: 74222 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:6
1600-14C>T in intron 15 of TSC2: This variant is not expected to have clinical s ignificance because it has been identified in 6.9% (597/8600) of European Americ an chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (ht tp://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs45517185). -
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
- -
- -
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:4
This variant is considered benign. This variant is intronic and is not expected to impact mRNA splicing. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
- -
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Benign:2Other:1
This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -
- -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome;C0751674:Lymphangiomyomatosis Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at