NM_000548.5:c.3366T>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):āc.3366T>Cā(p.Arg1122Arg) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00000373 in 1,607,248 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000425 AC: 1AN: 235532Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000780 AC XY: 1AN XY: 128260
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000344 AC: 5AN: 1455096Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.00000553 AC XY: 4AN XY: 723356
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152152Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74322
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1Benign:2
- -
- -
- -
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
- -
- -
not specified Benign:1
Computational tools yielded predictions that this variant is unlikely to have an effect on normal RNA splicing. This nucleotide position exhibits low evolutionary conservation. This variant has been seen where an alternate explanation for disease was also identified. -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at