NM_000548.5:c.3918C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points: 0P and 10B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.3918C>T(p.Gly1306Gly) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000131 in 1,600,326 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Synonymous variant affecting the same amino acid position (i.e. G1306G) has been classified as Likely benign.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 synonymous
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -10 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000132 AC: 3AN: 227166 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 19AN: 1448156Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00000695 AC XY: 5AN XY: 718928 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000131 AC: 2AN: 152170Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74336 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:2Benign:1
Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; In silico analysis, which includes splice predictors and evolutionary conservation, suggests this variant may impact gene splicing. In the absence of RNA/functional studies, the actual effect of this sequence change is unknown.; This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 10732801) -
- -
The TSC2 c.3918C>T (p.Gly1306=) synonymous variant has been reported in the published literature in an individual with ovarian cancer (PMID: 38509102 (2024)). The frequency of this variant in the general population, 0.000013 (3/227166 chromosomes (Genome Aggregation Database, http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org)), is uninformative in the assessment of its pathogenicity. Analysis of this variant using software algorithms for the prediction of the effect of nucleotide changes on TSC2 mRNA splicing yielded predictions that this variant may result in the gain of a cryptic splice site without affecting the natural splice sites. Based on the available information, we are unable to determine the clinical significance of this variant. -
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance. -
- -
- -
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at