NM_000548.5:c.433G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points: 2P and 13B. PM5BP4BP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.433G>A(p.Ala145Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000167 in 1,614,112 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. A145S) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -11 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000477 AC: 12AN: 251490Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000662 AC XY: 9AN XY: 135920
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000178 AC: 26AN: 1461890Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000151 AC XY: 11AN XY: 727246
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00000657 AC: 1AN: 152222Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 74372
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at