NM_000548.5:c.5017G>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points: 4P and 20B. PM1PM5BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.5017G>C(p.Val1673Leu) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000221 in 1,612,026 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. V1673F) has been classified as Likely pathogenic.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- tuberous sclerosisInheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
- tuberous sclerosis 2Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: PanelApp Australia, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Genomics England PanelApp, Ambry Genetics
- lymphangioleiomyomatosisInheritance: AD Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
- tuberous sclerosis complexInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -16 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000548.5. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | NM_000548.5 | MANE Select | c.5017G>C | p.Val1673Leu | missense | Exon 39 of 42 | NP_000539.2 | ||
| TSC2 | NM_001406663.1 | c.5014G>C | p.Val1672Leu | missense | Exon 39 of 42 | NP_001393592.1 | |||
| TSC2 | NM_001114382.3 | c.4948G>C | p.Val1650Leu | missense | Exon 38 of 41 | NP_001107854.1 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Selected | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSC2 | ENST00000219476.9 | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.5017G>C | p.Val1673Leu | missense | Exon 39 of 42 | ENSP00000219476.3 | ||
| TSC2 | ENST00000350773.9 | TSL:1 | c.4948G>C | p.Val1650Leu | missense | Exon 38 of 41 | ENSP00000344383.4 | ||
| TSC2 | ENST00000401874.7 | TSL:1 | c.4816G>C | p.Val1606Leu | missense | Exon 37 of 40 | ENSP00000384468.2 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000988 AC: 15AN: 151850Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000500 AC: 125AN: 249792 AF XY: 0.000634 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000234 AC: 342AN: 1460060Hom.: 6 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000306 AC XY: 222AN XY: 726318 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000987 AC: 15AN: 151966Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000162 AC XY: 12AN XY: 74298 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:3
This variant is considered likely benign. This variant has been observed at a population frequency that is significantly greater than expected given the associated disease prevalence and penetrance.
not provided Benign:3
This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 24728327, 15595939, 28991257)
TSC2: BS1, BS2
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.
TSC2-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications).
not specified Other:1
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Other:1
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at