NM_000548.5:c.760G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP6_Very_StrongBS2
The NM_000548.5(TSC2):c.760G>A(p.Glu254Lys) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000503 in 1,609,642 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_000548.5 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -12 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.0000605 AC: 15AN: 247960Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.0000670 AC XY: 9AN XY: 134312
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000473 AC: 69AN: 1457430Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000510 AC XY: 37AN XY: 725234
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000788 AC: 12AN: 152212Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74362
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
Tuberous sclerosis 2 Benign:2
- -
- -
Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:2
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
- -
not specified Benign:1
This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -
not provided Benign:1
TSC2: PP3, BS2 -
Tuberous sclerosis syndrome Other:1
- -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at