NM_000719.7:c.5361G>A

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BA1

The NM_000719.7(CACNA1C):​c.5361G>A​(p.Thr1787Thr) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.694 in 1,608,514 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 398,256 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.58 ( 28886 hom., cov: 34)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.71 ( 369370 hom. )

Consequence

CACNA1C
NM_000719.7 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -3.82

Publications

43 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
CACNA1C (HGNC:1390): (calcium voltage-gated channel subunit alpha1 C) This gene encodes an alpha-1 subunit of a voltage-dependent calcium channel. Calcium channels mediate the influx of calcium ions into the cell upon membrane polarization. The alpha-1 subunit consists of 24 transmembrane segments and forms the pore through which ions pass into the cell. The calcium channel consists of a complex of alpha-1, alpha-2/delta, beta, and gamma subunits in a 1:1:1:1 ratio. There are multiple isoforms of each of these proteins, either encoded by different genes or the result of alternative splicing of transcripts. The protein encoded by this gene binds to and is inhibited by dihydropyridine. Alternative splicing results in many transcript variants encoding different proteins. Some of the predicted proteins may not produce functional ion channel subunits. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2012]
ITFG2-AS1 (HGNC:53128): (ITFG2 antisense RNA 1)
CACNA1C-AS1 (HGNC:40119): (CACNA1C antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 12-2679713-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-2679713-G-A is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93413.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-3.82 with no splicing effect.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.721 is higher than 0.05.

Variant Effect in Transcripts

ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_000719.7. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.

RefSeq Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CACNA1C
NM_000719.7
MANE Select
c.5361G>Ap.Thr1787Thr
synonymous
Exon 42 of 47NP_000710.5
CACNA1C
NM_001167623.2
MANE Plus Clinical
c.5361G>Ap.Thr1787Thr
synonymous
Exon 42 of 47NP_001161095.1
CACNA1C
NM_199460.4
c.5505G>Ap.Thr1835Thr
synonymous
Exon 44 of 50NP_955630.3

Ensembl Transcripts

Selected
GeneTranscriptTagsHGVScHGVSpEffectExon RankProteinUniProt
CACNA1C
ENST00000399603.6
TSL:5 MANE Plus Clinical
c.5361G>Ap.Thr1787Thr
synonymous
Exon 42 of 47ENSP00000382512.1
CACNA1C
ENST00000399655.6
TSL:1 MANE Select
c.5361G>Ap.Thr1787Thr
synonymous
Exon 42 of 47ENSP00000382563.1
CACNA1C
ENST00000682544.1
c.5595G>Ap.Thr1865Thr
synonymous
Exon 44 of 50ENSP00000507184.1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.578
AC:
87834
AN:
152028
Hom.:
28877
Cov.:
34
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.236
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.613
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.644
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.672
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.624
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.667
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.767
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.462
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.726
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.586
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.677
AC:
160515
AN:
236924
AF XY:
0.683
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.236
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.706
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.664
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.624
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.763
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.723
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.676
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.706
AC:
1028616
AN:
1456368
Hom.:
369370
Cov.:
61
AF XY:
0.706
AC XY:
511204
AN XY:
724000
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.211
AC:
7042
AN:
33324
American (AMR)
AF:
0.696
AC:
30584
AN:
43920
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.661
AC:
17162
AN:
25966
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.598
AC:
23611
AN:
39470
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.657
AC:
56201
AN:
85508
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.758
AC:
40148
AN:
52972
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.511
AC:
2946
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.731
AC:
810544
AN:
1109268
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.671
AC:
40378
AN:
60178
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.478
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16487
32973
49460
65946
82433
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
19846
39692
59538
79384
99230
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.577
AC:
87853
AN:
152146
Hom.:
28886
Cov.:
34
AF XY:
0.581
AC XY:
43218
AN XY:
74394
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.236
AC:
9782
AN:
41508
American (AMR)
AF:
0.644
AC:
9847
AN:
15288
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.672
AC:
2333
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.623
AC:
3211
AN:
5152
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.666
AC:
3212
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.767
AC:
8132
AN:
10602
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.483
AC:
142
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.727
AC:
49390
AN:
67982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.589
AC:
1245
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.499
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1580
3161
4741
6322
7902
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
718
1436
2154
2872
3590
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.675
Hom.:
21008
Bravo
AF:
0.553
Asia WGS
AF:
0.637
AC:
2211
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:6
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Jul 10, 2011
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease.

May 13, 2014
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

Apr 09, 2025
Molecular Diagnostic Laboratory for Inherited Cardiovascular Disease, Montreal Heart Institute
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Timothy syndrome Benign:1
Jul 14, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

not provided Benign:1
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

Long QT syndrome Benign:1
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
Sep 04, 2015
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity.

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.9

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.0040
DANN
Benign
0.90
PhyloP100
-3.8
Mutation Taster
=89/11
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs1051375; hg19: chr12-2788879; COSMIC: COSV59695567; COSMIC: COSV59695567; API