NM_001002925.1:c.175C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points: 2P and 2B. PM2BP4_Moderate
The NM_001002925.1(OR5AP2):c.175C>T(p.Leu59Phe) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,858 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 14/20 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar. Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. L59I) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001002925.1 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Uncertain_significance. The variant received 0 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001002925.1. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR5AP2 | NM_001002925.1 | MANE Select | c.175C>T | p.Leu59Phe | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | NP_001002925.1 | Q8NGF4 |
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR5AP2 | ENST00000544374.3 | TSL:6 MANE Select | c.175C>T | p.Leu59Phe | missense | Exon 1 of 1 | ENSP00000442701.2 | Q8NGF4 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251200 AF XY: 0.00 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461858Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00 AC XY: 0AN XY: 727234 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at