NM_001006658.3:c.605A>C
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points: 0P and 2B. BP4_Moderate
The NM_001006658.3(CR2):c.605A>C(p.Lys202Thr) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000041 in 1,461,760 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 17/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001006658.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- immunodeficiency, common variable, 7Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen, Ambry Genetics, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae)
- common variable immunodeficiencyInheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- systemic lupus erythematosusInheritance: Unknown Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -2 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001006658.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CR2 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.605A>C | p.Lys202Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 20 | ENSP00000356024.3 | P20023-3 | ||
| CR2 | TSL:1 | c.605A>C | p.Lys202Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 19 | ENSP00000356025.3 | P20023-1 | ||
| CR2 | TSL:1 | c.605A>C | p.Lys202Thr | missense | Exon 3 of 18 | ENSP00000356026.3 | Q5SR47 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000410 AC: 6AN: 1461760Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000413 AC XY: 3AN XY: 727174 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at