NM_001009944.3:c.4495C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001009944.3(PKD1):​c.4495C>T​(p.Leu1499Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0031 in 1,610,266 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 9 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0027 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.0031 ( 9 hom. )

Consequence

PKD1
NM_001009944.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.25
Variant links:
Genes affected
PKD1 (HGNC:9008): (polycystin 1, transient receptor potential channel interacting) This gene encodes a member of the polycystin protein family. The encoded glycoprotein contains a large N-terminal extracellular region, multiple transmembrane domains and a cytoplasmic C-tail. It is an integral membrane protein that functions as a regulator of calcium permeable cation channels and intracellular calcium homoeostasis. It is also involved in cell-cell/matrix interactions and may modulate G-protein-coupled signal-transduction pathways. It plays a role in renal tubular development, and mutations in this gene cause autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease type 1 (ADPKD1). ADPKD1 is characterized by the growth of fluid-filled cysts that replace normal renal tissue and result in end-stage renal failure. Splice variants encoding different isoforms have been noted for this gene. Also, six pseudogenes, closely linked in a known duplicated region on chromosome 16p, have been described. [provided by RefSeq, Oct 2008]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.71).
BP6
Variant 16-2110672-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr16-2110672-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 256966.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr16-2110672-G-A is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr16-2110672-G-A is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.25 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00271 (413/152366) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00451 (307/68028). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0041. There are 0 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 186 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 413 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
PKD1NM_001009944.3 linkc.4495C>T p.Leu1499Leu synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 46 ENST00000262304.9 NP_001009944.3

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
PKD1ENST00000262304.9 linkc.4495C>T p.Leu1499Leu synonymous_variant Exon 15 of 46 1 NM_001009944.3 ENSP00000262304.4 P98161-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00272
AC:
414
AN:
152248
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.000675
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00219
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0190
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00382
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00262
AC:
647
AN:
246570
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.00275
AC XY:
371
AN XY:
134718
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.000263
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00214
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00797
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00101
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000466
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.00381
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.00450
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.00314
AC:
4581
AN:
1457900
Hom.:
9
Cov.:
36
AF XY:
0.00322
AC XY:
2336
AN XY:
725154
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.000539
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.00239
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00605
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.00114
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.000538
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00352
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.00357
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00271
AC:
413
AN:
152366
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.00250
AC XY:
186
AN XY:
74508
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.000673
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00216
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00547
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.00124
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.000470
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.00451
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00378
Alfa
AF:
0.00406
Hom.:
1
Bravo
AF:
0.00274
EpiCase
AF:
0.00600
EpiControl
AF:
0.00498

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Nov 19, 2019
Athena Diagnostics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4
Oct 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

PKD1: BP4, BP7 -

Jan 19, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 18837007, 29860066) -

-
Laboratory of Diagnostic Genome Analysis, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC)
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: not provided

- -

Polycystic kidney disease, adult type Benign:2
Jun 02, 2020
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Aug 10, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Polycystic kidney disease Benign:1
-
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Sinai Health System
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

The PKD1 p.Leu1499= variant was identified in 5 of 578 proband chromosomes (frequency: 0.009) from individuals or families with ADPKD (Rossetti 2012, Tan 2009). The variant was also identified in the following databases: dbSNP (ID: rs142002333) as “with Likely benign allele”, ClinVar (classified as likely benign by Prevention Genetics), GeneInsight-COGR (classified as benign by a clinical laboratory - LMM), ADPKD Mutation Database (classified as likely neutral). The variant was not identified in LOVD 3.0, PKD1-LOVD, databases. The variant was identified in control databases in 713 (1 homozygous) of 274464 chromosomes at a frequency of 0.003 increasing the likelihood this could be a low frequency benign variant (Genome Aggregation Consortium Feb 27, 2017). In addition we cannot be certain that data from control databases is specific to PKD1 and not from one of the six PKD1 pseudogenes. The p.Leu1499= variant is not expected to have clinical significance because it does not result in a change of amino acid and is not located in a known consensus splice site. In addition, in silico or computational prediction software programs (SpliceSiteFinder, MaxEntScan, NNSPLICE, GeneSplicer, HumanSpliceFinder) do not predict a difference in splicing. In summary, based on the above information, the clinical significance of this variant cannot be determined with certainty at this time although we would lean towards a more benign role for this variant. This variant is classified as likely benign. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.71
CADD
Benign
0.46
DANN
Benign
0.68
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
2.8

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs142002333; hg19: chr16-2160673; API