NM_001014443.3:c.113G>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points: 0P and 6B. BP4_ModerateBS2
The NM_001014443.3(USP21):c.113G>A(p.Arg38His) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000384 in 1,614,046 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001014443.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -6 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001014443.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
RefSeq Transcripts
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USP21 | TSL:1 MANE Select | c.113G>A | p.Arg38His | missense | Exon 3 of 14 | ENSP00000356981.3 | Q9UK80-1 | ||
| USP21 | TSL:1 | c.113G>A | p.Arg38His | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | ENSP00000289865.8 | Q9UK80-1 | ||
| USP21 | TSL:1 | c.113G>A | p.Arg38His | missense | Exon 2 of 13 | ENSP00000356980.1 | Q9UK80-3 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000279 AC: 7AN: 251258 AF XY: 0.0000294 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000397 AC: 58AN: 1461842Hom.: 0 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.0000358 AC XY: 26AN XY: 727226 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000263 AC: 4AN: 152204Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000403 AC XY: 3AN XY: 74354 show subpopulations ⚠️ The allele balance in gnomAD version 4 Genomes is significantly skewed from the expected value of 0.5.
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at