NM_001035.3:c.7488C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001035.3(RYR2):c.7488C>T(p.Leu2496Leu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00446 in 1,610,118 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 24 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0038 ( 3 hom., cov: 33)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.0045 ( 21 hom. )

Consequence

RYR2
NM_001035.3 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:17

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.294

Variant links:

Genes affected

RYR2 (HGNC:10484): (ryanodine receptor 2) This gene encodes a ryanodine receptor found in cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. The encoded protein is one of the components of a calcium channel, composed of a tetramer of the ryanodine receptor proteins and a tetramer of FK506 binding protein 1B proteins, that supplies calcium to cardiac muscle. Mutations in this gene are associated with stress-induced polymorphic ventricular tachycardia and arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

RYR2 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.31).

BP6

Variant 1-237648589-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr1-237648589-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 36749.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr1-237648589-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign]. Variant chr1-237648589-C-T is described in Lovd as [Likely_benign].

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.294 with no splicing effect.

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.0038 (579/152254) while in subpopulation NFE AF= 0.00488 (332/68018). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.00445. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 332 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position pass quality control queck.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 579 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	NM_001035.3 link	c.7488C>T	p.Leu2496Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 105	ENST00000366574.7	NP_001026.2	Q92736-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
RYR2	ENST00000366574.7 link	c.7488C>T	p.Leu2496Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 105	1	NM_001035.3	ENSP00000355533.2	Q92736-1
RYR2	ENST00000609119.2 link	n.7488C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 49 of 104	5		ENSP00000499659.2	A0A590UK06
RYR2	ENST00000660292.2 link	c.7488C>T	p.Leu2496Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 106			ENSP00000499787.2	A0A590UKB7
RYR2	ENST00000659194.3 link	c.7488C>T	p.Leu2496Leu	synonymous_variant	Exon 49 of 105			ENSP00000499653.3	A0A590UJZ8

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.00381

AC:

579

AN:

152136

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.00106

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00110

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00223

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.00488

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00382

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.00377

AC:

914

AN:

242464

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.00376

AC XY:

494

AN XY:

131298

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000813

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00100

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.000712

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00150

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.0143

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00454

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.00253

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.00453

AC:

6601

AN:

1457864

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00452

AC XY:

3278

AN XY:

724714

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000538

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.00115

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.000616

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00178

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.0144

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.00488

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.00279

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.00380

AC:

579

AN:

152254

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.00446

AC XY:

332

AN XY:

74444

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.00106

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00222

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.000577

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00166

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.0141

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.00488

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00378

Alfa

AF:

0.00334

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.00249

Asia WGS

AF:

0.000577

AC:

AN:

3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:17

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified

Benign:6

Nov 27, 2013

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

May 24, 2012

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Leu2496Leu in Exon 49 of RYR2: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue, is not located within the splice consensus sequence and has been identified in 0.6% (39/6624) of Euro pean American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs143906555). -

Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided

Benign:4

Feb 01, 2025

CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

RYR2: BP4, BP7, BS1, BS2 -

Nov 29, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 03, 2015

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Cardiomyopathy

Benign:2

Sep 02, 2016

CHEO Genetics Diagnostic Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 08, 2018

Color Diagnostics, LLC DBA Color Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia 1

Benign:2

Jan 31, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Benign:1

Feb 05, 2024

All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia 2

Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Cardiac arrhythmia

Benign:1

Oct 07, 2014

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.31

CADD

Benign

6.5

DANN

Benign

0.85

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over