NM_001037.5:c.40+15G>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001037.5(SCN1B):​c.40+15G>T variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.204 in 659,806 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 14,317 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.19 ( 2955 hom., cov: 31)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.21 ( 11362 hom. )

Consequence

SCN1B
NM_001037.5 intron

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:11

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.18

Publications

3 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
SCN1B (HGNC:10586): (sodium voltage-gated channel beta subunit 1) Voltage-gated sodium channels are heteromeric proteins that function in the generation and propagation of action potentials in muscle and neuronal cells. They are composed of one alpha and two beta subunits, where the alpha subunit provides channel activity and the beta-1 subunit modulates the kinetics of channel inactivation. This gene encodes a sodium channel beta-1 subunit. Mutations in this gene result in generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, Brugada syndrome 5, and defects in cardiac conduction. Multiple transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene.[provided by RefSeq, Oct 2009]
HPN-AS1 (HGNC:47041): (HPN antisense RNA 1)

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.82).
BP6
Variant 19-35030875-G-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr19-35030875-G-T is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 93481.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AMR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.21 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
SCN1BNM_001037.5 linkc.40+15G>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 5 ENST00000262631.11 NP_001028.1 Q07699-1
SCN1BNM_199037.5 linkc.40+15G>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 2 NP_950238.1 Q07699-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
SCN1BENST00000262631.11 linkc.40+15G>T intron_variant Intron 1 of 5 1 NM_001037.5 ENSP00000262631.3 Q07699-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.195
AC:
29144
AN:
149626
Hom.:
2956
Cov.:
31
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.188
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.273
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.217
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.222
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0507
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0849
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.205
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.271
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.208
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.217
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.310
AC:
18
AN:
58
AF XY:
0.321
show subpopulations
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.500
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.296
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.207
AC:
105364
AN:
510072
Hom.:
11362
Cov.:
7
AF XY:
0.207
AC XY:
50782
AN XY:
245356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.199
AC:
2009
AN:
10090
American (AMR)
AF:
0.249
AC:
838
AN:
3372
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.236
AC:
1344
AN:
5690
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.105
AC:
959
AN:
9112
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0866
AC:
846
AN:
9772
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.247
AC:
2932
AN:
11884
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.284
AC:
368
AN:
1296
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.210
AC:
92111
AN:
439444
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.204
AC:
3957
AN:
19412
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.523
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3469
6938
10406
13875
17344
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3636
7272
10908
14544
18180
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.195
AC:
29152
AN:
149734
Hom.:
2955
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
0.193
AC XY:
14099
AN XY:
73068
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.188
AC:
7737
AN:
41236
American (AMR)
AF:
0.216
AC:
3263
AN:
15082
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.222
AC:
763
AN:
3436
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0505
AC:
257
AN:
5088
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0844
AC:
407
AN:
4824
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.205
AC:
1992
AN:
9696
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.284
AC:
83
AN:
292
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.208
AC:
13950
AN:
67088
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.217
AC:
453
AN:
2086
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1186
2371
3557
4742
5928
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
302
604
906
1208
1510
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.208
Hom.:
404
Bravo
AF:
0.195
Asia WGS
AF:
0.105
AC:
337
AN:
3200

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:11
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:7
Mar 22, 2018
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Mar 12, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics, Academic Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jul 15, 2024
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 39% of patients studied in a panel designed for Epileptic and Developmental Encephalopathy and Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy. Number of patients: 36. Only high quality variants are reported. -

Brugada syndrome 5 Benign:2
Feb 04, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Generalized epilepsy with febrile seizures plus, type 1 Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.82
CADD
Benign
9.5
DANN
Benign
0.42
PhyloP100
1.2
PromoterAI
-0.087
Neutral
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs72556351; hg19: chr19-35521779; API