NM_001040142.2:c.5493A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Uncertain significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points: 5P and 1B. PM1PM2PP2BP4
The NM_001040142.2(SCN2A):c.5493A>G(p.Ile1831Met) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000000684 in 1,461,844 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001040142.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Uncertain_significance. Variant got 4 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Gene | Transcript | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon rank | TSL | MANE | Protein | Appris | UniProt |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCN2A | ENST00000375437.7 | c.5493A>G | p.Ile1831Met | missense_variant | Exon 27 of 27 | 5 | NM_001040142.2 | ENSP00000364586.2 | ||
SCN2A | ENST00000631182.3 | c.5493A>G | p.Ile1831Met | missense_variant | Exon 27 of 27 | 5 | NM_001371246.1 | ENSP00000486885.1 | ||
SCN2A | ENST00000283256.10 | c.5493A>G | p.Ile1831Met | missense_variant | Exon 27 of 27 | 1 | ENSP00000283256.6 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00000398 AC: 1AN: 251204Hom.: 0 AF XY: 0.00000737 AC XY: 1AN XY: 135750
GnomAD4 exome AF: 6.84e-7 AC: 1AN: 1461844Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000138 AC XY: 1AN XY: 727218
GnomAD4 genome Cov.: 32
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Uncertain:1
- -
not provided Uncertain:1
The majority of missense variants in this gene are considered pathogenic (Stenson et al., 2014); In silico analysis, which includes protein predictors and evolutionary conservation, supports that this variant does not alter protein structure/function; This substitution is predicted to be within the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge; Not observed at significant frequency in large population cohorts (Lek et al., 2016) -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at