NM_001042432.2:c.776C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points: 0P and 3B. BP4_ModerateBS1_Supporting

The NM_001042432.2(CLN3):c.776C>T(p.Pro259Leu) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000064 in 1,609,192 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. P259S) has been classified as Uncertain significance.

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00029 ( 0 hom., cov: 31)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000040 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

CLN3
NM_001042432.2 missense

Scores

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts U:6

Conservation

PhyloP100: 2.01

Publications

4 publications found

Variant links:

Genes affected

CLN3 (HGNC:2074): (CLN3 lysosomal/endosomal transmembrane protein, battenin) This gene encodes a protein that is involved in lysosomal function. Mutations in this, as well as other neuronal ceroid-lipofuscinosis (CLN) genes, cause neurodegenerative diseases commonly known as Batten disease or collectively known as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs). Many alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

CLN3 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):

inherited retinal dystrophy
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: G2P
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: ClinGen
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3
Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Ambry Genetics, Genomics England PanelApp, G2P, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Myriad Women’s Health

CLN3 links:

ENSG00000261832 (HGNC:):

ENSG00000261832 links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -3 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (MetaRNN=0.09393957).

BS1

Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.000289 (44/152218) while in subpopulation AFR AF = 0.000987 (41/41542). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.000747. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 17 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 31. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
CLN3	NM_001042432.2 link	c.776C>T	p.Pro259Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 16	ENST00000636147.2	NP_001035897.1	Q13286-1A0A024QZB8

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
CLN3	ENST00000636147.2 link	c.776C>T	p.Pro259Leu	missense_variant	Exon 10 of 16	1	NM_001042432.2	ENSP00000490105.1		Q13286-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

152100

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000990

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.0000655

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.00

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.0000294

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD2 exomes

AF:

0.0000539

AC:

AN:

241400

AF XY:

0.0000383

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000590

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.0000296

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.00000918

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000169

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000405

AC:

AN:

1456974

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000373

AC XY:

AN XY:

724270

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.00105

AC:

AN:

33408

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000907

AC:

AN:

44098

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

25952

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.0000505

AC:

AN:

39602

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

85132

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

53106

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.000349

AC:

AN:

5736

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000117

AC:

AN:

1109750

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.0000332

AC:

AN:

60190

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.480

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000289

AC:

AN:

152218

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000228

AC XY:

AN XY:

74438

show subpopulations

African (AFR)

AF:

0.000987

AC:

AN:

41542

American (AMR)

AF:

0.0000655

AC:

AN:

15278

Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

3470

East Asian (EAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

5168

South Asian (SAS)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

4824

European-Finnish (FIN)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

10610

Middle Eastern (MID)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

294

European-Non Finnish (NFE)

AF:

0.0000294

AC:

AN:

68008

Other (OTH)

AF:

0.00

AC:

AN:

2114

Allele Balance Distribution

Red line indicates average allele balance

Average allele balance: 0.514

Heterozygous variant carriers

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

0.95

Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het

Variant carriers

<30

30-35

35-40

40-45

45-50

50-55

55-60

60-65

65-70

70-75

75-80

>80

Age

Alfa

AF:

0.000310

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000238

ESP6500AA

AF:

0.000455

AC:

ESP6500EA

AF:

0.00

AC:

ExAC

AF:

0.0000741

AC:

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance

Submissions summary: Uncertain:6

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided

Uncertain:3

Aug 21, 2020

GeneDx

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

In silico analysis supports that this missense variant has a deleterious effect on protein structure/function; Has not been previously published as pathogenic or benign to our knowledge -

Jan 27, 2015

Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Aug 26, 2015

Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Inborn genetic diseases

Uncertain:1

Jun 22, 2022

Ambry Genetics

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

The p.P259L variant (also known as c.776C>T), located in coding exon 9 of the CLN3 gene, results from a C to T substitution at nucleotide position 776. The proline at codon 259 is replaced by leucine, an amino acid with similar properties. This amino acid position is not well conserved in available vertebrate species. In addition, the in silico prediction for this alteration is inconclusive. Since supporting evidence is limited at this time, the clinical significance of this alteration remains unclear. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

Uncertain:1

Jan 15, 2024

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

This sequence change replaces proline, which is neutral and non-polar, with leucine, which is neutral and non-polar, at codon 259 of the CLN3 protein (p.Pro259Leu). This variant is present in population databases (rs137858807, gnomAD 0.08%). This variant has not been reported in the literature in individuals affected with CLN3-related conditions. ClinVar contains an entry for this variant (Variation ID: 193616). An algorithm developed to predict the effect of missense changes on protein structure and function (PolyPhen-2) suggests that this variant¬†is likely to be tolerated. In summary, the available evidence is currently insufficient to determine the role of this variant in disease. Therefore, it has been classified as a Variant of Uncertain Significance. -

Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis 3

Uncertain:1

Sep 05, 2021

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance:Uncertain significance

Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

AlphaMissense

Benign

0.078

BayesDel_addAF

Benign

-0.18

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.090

CADD

Benign

(source)

DANN

Benign

0.97

DEOGEN2

Uncertain

0.75

.;D;D;.;.;D;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;.;.;.;T;T;T

Eigen

Benign

-0.24

Eigen_PC

Benign

-0.27

FATHMM_MKL

Benign

0.12

LIST_S2

Uncertain

0.96

D;.;.;T;.;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;.;D;D;D;D;D

M_CAP

Uncertain

0.18

MetaRNN

Benign

0.060

T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T;T

MetaSVM

Uncertain

0.45

MutationAssessor

Uncertain

2.5

.;M;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;M;.;M;.;.;.;.;.;.;.

PhyloP100

2.0

PrimateAI

Benign

0.33

PROVEAN

Uncertain

-2.4

.;.;N;.;.;D;N;D;.;N;.;N;.;.;D;.;N;.;D

REVEL

Uncertain

0.29

Sift

Uncertain

0.021

.;.;D;.;.;D;D;T;.;D;.;T;.;.;T;.;D;.;D

Sift4G

Benign

0.081

.;.;.;T;.;T;T;D;.;T;.;T;.;.;.;.;D;.;.

Polyphen

0.63, 0.18, 0.78, 0.45, 0.58, 0.70

.;P;P;.;.;B;.;.;.;P;B;P;B;.;P;.;P;.;.

Vest4

0.33, 0.32, 0.35, 0.31, 0.40

MVP

0.95

MPC

0.22

ClinPred

0.041

GERP RS

4.3

RBP_binding_hub_radar

0.0

RBP_regulation_power_radar

1.1

Varity_R

0.098

gMVP

0.33

Mutation Taster

=75/25

polymorphism

(source)

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

Publications

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

Age Distribution

Age Distribution

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

Other links and lift over