NM_001042492.3:c.4749A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points: 0P and 7B. BP4_StrongBP6BP7BS2_Supporting

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.4749A>G​(p.Glu1583Glu) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000223 in 1,613,306 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00018 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00023 ( 2 hom. )

Consequence

NF1
NM_001042492.3 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity criteria provided, conflicting classifications U:3B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.43

Publications

2 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]
NF1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • neurofibromatosis type 1
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), ClinGen, PanelApp Australia, G2P, Genomics England PanelApp
  • neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Genomics England PanelApp, PanelApp Australia
  • Moyamoya disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • hereditary pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma
    Inheritance: AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • familial ovarian cancer
    Inheritance: AD Classification: NO_KNOWN Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -7 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.54).
BP6
Variant 17-31265253-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31265253-A-G is described in ClinVar as Conflicting_classifications_of_pathogenicity. ClinVar VariationId is 184594.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=1.43 with no splicing effect.
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 28 AD gene. Variant has AC lower than other variant known as pathogenic in the gene, so the strength is limited to Supporting.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
NF1NM_001042492.3 linkc.4749A>G p.Glu1583Glu synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 58 ENST00000358273.9 NP_001035957.1 P21359-1
NF1NM_000267.4 linkc.4686A>G p.Glu1562Glu synonymous_variant Exon 35 of 57 NP_000258.1 P21359-2

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
NF1ENST00000358273.9 linkc.4749A>G p.Glu1583Glu synonymous_variant Exon 36 of 58 1 NM_001042492.3 ENSP00000351015.4 P21359-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152238
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0000241
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0000654
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.000282
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000323
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.000478
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.000231
AC:
58
AN:
250950
AF XY:
0.000228
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0000623
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000492
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.000231
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000273
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000655
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000227
AC:
332
AN:
1460950
Hom.:
2
Cov.:
30
AF XY:
0.000204
AC XY:
148
AN XY:
726830
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000299
AC:
1
AN:
33434
American (AMR)
AF:
0.000581
AC:
26
AN:
44720
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
26118
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
39582
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0000116
AC:
1
AN:
86236
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000206
AC:
11
AN:
53384
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5746
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000252
AC:
280
AN:
1111398
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000215
AC:
13
AN:
60332
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.451
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
16
32
48
64
80
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
20
40
60
80
100
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.000184
AC:
28
AN:
152356
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000148
AC XY:
11
AN XY:
74514
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0000241
AC:
1
AN:
41578
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000653
AC:
1
AN:
15308
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5192
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.000282
AC:
3
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000323
AC:
22
AN:
68040
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.000473
AC:
1
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.496
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
3
5
8
10
13
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000298
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.000200
EpiCase
AF:
0.000273
EpiControl
AF:
0.000474

ClinVar

Significance: Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity
Submissions summary: Uncertain:3Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, conflicting classifications
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not provided Benign:3
Oct 20, 2017
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 01, 2024
CeGaT Center for Human Genetics Tuebingen
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

NF1: BP4, BP7 -

Oct 26, 2021
GeneDx
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is associated with the following publications: (PMID: 21354044) -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:3
Nov 20, 2024
Institute for Biomarker Research, Medical Diagnostic Laboratories, L.L.C.
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

The synonymous variant NM_000267.3(NF1):c.4686A>G (p.Glu1562=) has not been reported previously as a pathogenic variant, to our knowledge. The variant is observed in one or more well-documented healthy adults. The p.Glu1562= variant is not predicted to disrupt an existing splice site. The p.Glu1562= variant results in a substitution of a base that is not predicted conserved by GERP++ and PhyloP. For these reasons, this variant has been classified as Likely Benign. -

Mar 01, 2021
Sema4, Sema4
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:curation

- -

Oct 09, 2014
Ambry Genetics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Uncertain:1Benign:1
Jan 29, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

not specified Benign:2
Aug 23, 2017
Genetic Services Laboratory, University of Chicago
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Dec 07, 2019
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Uncertain:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1
Jan 12, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.54
CADD
Benign
5.9
DANN
Benign
0.56
PhyloP100
1.4
RBP_binding_hub_radar
0.0
RBP_regulation_power_radar
1.7
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.010
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs144091165; hg19: chr17-29592271; COSMIC: COSV62197808; COSMIC: COSV62197808; API