NM_001042492.3:c.7755C>T

Variant names:

• chr17-31356976-C-T
• rs17881980
• NM_001042492.3:c.7755C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points: 0P and 19B. BP4_Moderate BP6_Very_Strong BP7 BS1 BS2

The NM_001042492.3(NF1):​c.7755C>T​(p.Ser2585Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00187 in 1,613,820 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 44 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

• Frequency:
  • Genomes: 𝑓 0.0098 (23 hom., cov: 32)
  • Exomes 𝑓: 0.0010 (21 hom.)
• Consequence: NF1 NM_001042492.3 synonymous
• Clinical Significance: Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:19
• Conservation: PhyloP100: 0.835

Genes affected

NF1 (HGNC:7765): (neurofibromin 1) This gene product appears to function as a negative regulator of the ras signal transduction pathway. Mutations in this gene have been linked to neurofibromatosis type 1, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia and Watson syndrome. The mRNA for this gene is subject to RNA editing (CGA>UGA->Arg1306Term) resulting in premature translation termination. Alternatively spliced transcript variants encoding different isoforms have also been described for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACMG classification

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -19 ACMG points.

• BP4: Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.27).
• BP6: Variant 17-31356976-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-31356976-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 184185.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars. Variant chr17-31356976-C-T is described in Lovd as [Benign].
• BP7: Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=0.835 with no splicing effect.
• BS1: Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00982 (1494/152200) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0339 (1409/41526). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0325. There are 23 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 718 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
• BS2: High AC in GnomAd4 at 1494 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
NF1	NM_001042492.3	c.7755C>T	p.Ser2585Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 53 of 58	ENST00000358273.9	NP_001035957.1
NF1	NM_000267.3	c.7692C>T	p.Ser2564Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 52 of 57		NP_000258.1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	Appris	UniProt
NF1	ENST00000358273.9	c.7755C>T	p.Ser2585Ser	synonymous_variant	Exon 53 of 58	1	NM_001042492.3	ENSP00000351015.4

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.00984 AC: 1496 AN: 152082 Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32

Gnomad AFR AF: 0.0340

Gnomad AMI AF: 0.00

Gnomad AMR AF: 0.00445

Gnomad ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS AF: 0.000622

Gnomad FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad MID AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE AF: 0.0000882

Gnomad OTH AF: 0.00527

GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.00264 AC: 662 AN: 251168 Hom.: 11 AF XY: 0.00194 AC XY: 263 AN XY: 135756

Gnomad AFR exome AF: 0.0350

Gnomad AMR exome AF: 0.00220

Gnomad ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad SAS exome AF: 0.000163

Gnomad FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad NFE exome AF: 0.0000440

Gnomad OTH exome AF: 0.00114

GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00104 AC: 1518 AN: 1461620 Hom.: 21 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000886 AC XY: 644 AN XY: 727102

Gnomad4 AFR exome AF: 0.0358

Gnomad4 AMR exome AF: 0.00273

Gnomad4 ASJ exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome AF: 0.0000928

Gnomad4 FIN exome AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE exome AF: 0.0000387

Gnomad4 OTH exome AF: 0.00232

GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.00982 AC: 1494 AN: 152200 Hom.: 23 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.00965 AC XY: 718 AN XY: 74396

Gnomad4 AFR AF: 0.0339

Gnomad4 AMR AF: 0.00438

Gnomad4 ASJ AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 EAS AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 SAS AF: 0.000208

Gnomad4 FIN AF: 0.00

Gnomad4 NFE AF: 0.0000882

Gnomad4 OTH AF: 0.00522

Alfa AF: 0.00540 Hom.: 4

Bravo AF: 0.0115

Asia WGS AF: 0.00289 AC: 10 AN: 3478

EpiCase AF: 0.000109

EpiControl AF: 0.00

ClinVar

Significance: Benign

Submissions summary: Benign:19

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

Submissions by phenotype

Neurofibromatosis, type 1 Benign:5

Feb 04, 2025

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Feb 01, 2025

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 15, 2022

Genome-Nilou Lab

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Oct 26, 2020

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, The Hospital for Sick Children

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:4

Nov 24, 2014

Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Ser2585Ser in exon 53 of NF1: This variant is not expected to have clinical sign ificance because it does not alter an amino acid residue and is not located with in the splice consensus sequence. It has been identified in 3.1% (136/4406) of A frican American chromosomes from a broad population by the NHLBI Exome Sequencin g Project (http://evs.gs.washington.edu/EVS; dbSNP rs17881980). -

-

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, Amsterdam University Medical Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:4

May 12, 2016

Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

Variant summary: The NF1 c.7692C>T (p.Ser2564Ser) variant causes a synonymous change involving a non-conserved nucleotide with 5/5 splice prediction tools calculating no significant effect on splicing, although these predictions have yet to be functionally assessed. This variant was found in the large, broad control population, ExAC, with an allele frequency of 403/121392 (11 homozygotes, 1/301, freq: 0.00332), predominantly in the African cohort, 371/10404 (1/28, 0.03566, 11 homozygotes), which significantly exceeds the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic NF1 variant of 1/4798 (0.0002084). Therefore, suggesting that the variant of interest is a common polymorphism found in population(s) of African origin. This variant, to our knowledge, has not been reported in affected individuals via publications, although, multiple clinical laboratories cite the variant as "benign." Therefore, taking all available lines of evidence into consideration, the variant of interest is classified as Benign. -

Sep 02, 2016

GeneDx

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Oct 20, 2023

ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

-

Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: not provided

- -

Neurofibromatosis, familial spinal Benign:2

Jul 07, 2023

KCCC/NGS Laboratory, Kuwait Cancer Control Center

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Café-au-lait macules with pulmonary stenosis Benign:1

Jan 12, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome;CN230736:Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1

Mar 23, 2016

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This alteration is classified as benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -

Hereditary cancer-predisposing syndrome Benign:1

Nov 19, 2014

Ambry Genetics

Significance: Benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

General population or subpopulation frequency is too high to be a pathogenic mutation based on disease/syndrome prevalence and penetrance -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
BayesDel_noAF	Benign	-0.27
CADD	Benign	9.9
DANN	Benign	0.65

Splicing

Name	Calibrated prediction	Score	Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)		0.050		Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs17881980; hg19: chr17-29683994; COSMIC: COSV62213456; COSMIC: COSV62213456;