NM_001065.4:c.740-9T>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001065.4(TNFRSF1A):​c.740-9T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.237 in 1,611,464 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 49,169 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.26 ( 5239 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.23 ( 43930 hom. )

Consequence

TNFRSF1A
NM_001065.4 intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00009474
2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.13

Publications

18 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
TNFRSF1A (HGNC:11916): (TNF receptor superfamily member 1A) This gene encodes a member of the TNF receptor superfamily of proteins. The encoded receptor is found in membrane-bound and soluble forms that interact with membrane-bound and soluble forms, respectively, of its ligand, tumor necrosis factor alpha. Binding of membrane-bound tumor necrosis factor alpha to the membrane-bound receptor induces receptor trimerization and activation, which plays a role in cell survival, apoptosis, and inflammation. Proteolytic processing of the encoded receptor results in release of the soluble form of the receptor, which can interact with free tumor necrosis factor alpha to inhibit inflammation. Mutations in this gene underlie tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS), characterized by fever, abdominal pain and other features. Mutations in this gene may also be associated with multiple sclerosis in human patients. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2016]
TNFRSF1A Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • TNF receptor 1-associated periodic fever syndrome
    Inheritance: AD Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Ambry Genetics, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Illumina

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.88).
BP6
Variant 12-6330304-A-G is Benign according to our data. Variant chr12-6330304-A-G is described in ClinVar as Benign. ClinVar VariationId is 257327.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (SAS) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.428 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
TNFRSF1ANM_001065.4 linkc.740-9T>C intron_variant Intron 7 of 9 ENST00000162749.7 NP_001056.1 P19438-1
TNFRSF1ANM_001346091.2 linkc.416-9T>C intron_variant Intron 6 of 8 NP_001333020.1 P19438-2J9PH39
TNFRSF1ANM_001346092.2 linkc.281-9T>C intron_variant Intron 8 of 10 NP_001333021.1 P19438
TNFRSF1ANR_144351.2 linkn.928-9T>C intron_variant Intron 6 of 8

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
TNFRSF1AENST00000162749.7 linkc.740-9T>C intron_variant Intron 7 of 9 1 NM_001065.4 ENSP00000162749.2 P19438-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.255
AC:
38810
AN:
151976
Hom.:
5227
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.274
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.298
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.342
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.248
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.336
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.445
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.219
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.215
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.210
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.286
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.280
AC:
70416
AN:
251338
AF XY:
0.283
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.272
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.390
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.258
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.326
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.229
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.208
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.269
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.235
AC:
342319
AN:
1459370
Hom.:
43930
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.240
AC XY:
174134
AN XY:
726140
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.272
AC:
9080
AN:
33428
American (AMR)
AF:
0.389
AC:
17412
AN:
44722
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.262
AC:
6831
AN:
26108
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.359
AC:
14239
AN:
39686
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.437
AC:
37673
AN:
86190
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.229
AC:
12208
AN:
53342
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.288
AC:
1660
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.205
AC:
228016
AN:
1109842
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.252
AC:
15200
AN:
60290
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.467
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
13685
27370
41054
54739
68424
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
8268
16536
24804
33072
41340
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.255
AC:
38854
AN:
152094
Hom.:
5239
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.261
AC XY:
19389
AN XY:
74328
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.274
AC:
11364
AN:
41466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.343
AC:
5239
AN:
15290
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.248
AC:
859
AN:
3468
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.337
AC:
1739
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.444
AC:
2138
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.219
AC:
2323
AN:
10588
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.224
AC:
66
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.210
AC:
14248
AN:
67986
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.287
AC:
606
AN:
2114
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1486
2972
4457
5943
7429
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
414
828
1242
1656
2070
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.228
Hom.:
3710
Bravo
AF:
0.262
Asia WGS
AF:
0.390
AC:
1358
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:4
Nov 12, 2023
Unidad de Genómica Garrahan, Hospital de Pediatría Garrahan
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is classified as Benign based on local population frequency. This variant was detected in 64% of patients studied by a panel of primary immunodeficiencies. Number of patients: 61. Only high quality variants are reported. -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Genome Diagnostics Laboratory, University Medical Center Utrecht
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:3
Mar 03, 2015
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Nov 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

TNF receptor-associated periodic fever syndrome (TRAPS) Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.88
CADD
Benign
12
DANN
Benign
0.73
PhyloP100
1.1
Mutation Taster
=100/0
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000095
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.040
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12426675; hg19: chr12-6439470; COSMIC: COSV50598650; COSMIC: COSV50598650; API