NM_001080463.2:c.12478-6C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001080463.2(DYNC2H1):​c.12478-6C>T variant causes a splice region, intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0879 in 1,608,958 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,590 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 3/3 splice prediction tools predict no significant impact on normal splicing. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.069 ( 424 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.090 ( 6166 hom. )

Consequence

DYNC2H1
NM_001080463.2 splice_region, intron

Scores

2
Splicing: ADA: 0.00002026
2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:10

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.628

Publications

7 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
DYNC2H1 (HGNC:2962): (dynein cytoplasmic 2 heavy chain 1) This gene encodes a large cytoplasmic dynein protein that is involved in retrograde transport in the cilium and has a role in intraflagellar transport, a process required for ciliary/flagellar assembly. Mutations in this gene cause a heterogeneous spectrum of conditions related to altered primary cilium function and often involve polydactyly, abnormal skeletogenesis, and polycystic kidneys. Alternative splicing results in multiple transcript variants encoding distinct proteins. [provided by RefSeq, Jan 2010]
DYNC2H1 Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, Orphanet, Ambry Genetics
  • Jeune syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Majewski type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
  • short rib-polydactyly syndrome, Verma-Naumoff type
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.86).
BP6
Variant 11-103455180-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr11-103455180-C-T is described in ClinVar as Benign/Likely_benign. ClinVar VariationId is 302124.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (NFE) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.0914 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
DYNC2H1NM_001080463.2 linkc.12478-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 86 of 89 ENST00000650373.2 NP_001073932.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1NM_001377.3 linkc.12457-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 85 of 88 ENST00000375735.7 NP_001368.2 Q8NCM8-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
DYNC2H1ENST00000650373.2 linkc.12478-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 86 of 89 NM_001080463.2 ENSP00000497174.1 Q8NCM8-2
DYNC2H1ENST00000375735.7 linkc.12457-6C>T splice_region_variant, intron_variant Intron 85 of 88 1 NM_001377.3 ENSP00000364887.2 Q8NCM8-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0686
AC:
10435
AN:
152046
Hom.:
421
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0171
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.232
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.0700
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.0720
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0591
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.0634
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.0988
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.0475
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0933
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.0876
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0769
AC:
19086
AN:
248072
AF XY:
0.0787
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0150
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.0535
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.0774
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0602
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.106
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0938
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.0925
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0899
AC:
130931
AN:
1456794
Hom.:
6166
Cov.:
29
AF XY:
0.0891
AC XY:
64555
AN XY:
724852
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0140
AC:
468
AN:
33348
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0564
AC:
2519
AN:
44632
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0773
AC:
2015
AN:
26054
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0715
AC:
2834
AN:
39610
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0610
AC:
5247
AN:
86030
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.108
AC:
5742
AN:
53304
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0703
AC:
405
AN:
5762
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0964
AC:
106785
AN:
1107884
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0817
AC:
4916
AN:
60170
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
5920
11840
17759
23679
29599
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
3946
7892
11838
15784
19730
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0686
AC:
10440
AN:
152164
Hom.:
424
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0697
AC XY:
5188
AN XY:
74384
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.0171
AC:
710
AN:
41552
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0699
AC:
1068
AN:
15282
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.0720
AC:
250
AN:
3470
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0593
AC:
307
AN:
5180
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.0647
AC:
312
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.0988
AC:
1047
AN:
10600
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.0476
AC:
14
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0933
AC:
6338
AN:
67942
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.0866
AC:
183
AN:
2112
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.503
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
483
967
1450
1934
2417
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
128
256
384
512
640
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.0790
Hom.:
844
Bravo
AF:
0.0654
Asia WGS
AF:
0.0450
AC:
158
AN:
3476
EpiCase
AF:
0.0917
EpiControl
AF:
0.0939

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:10
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:5
Mar 28, 2016
Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Mass General Brigham Personalized Medicine
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

Variant identified in a genome or exome case(s) and assessed due to predicted null impact of the variant or pathogenic assertions in the literature or databases. Disclaimer: This variant has not undergone full assessment. The following are preliminary notes: Frequency -

-
Joint Genome Diagnostic Labs from Nijmegen and Maastricht, Radboudumc and MUMC+
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Apr 15, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

-
Clinical Genetics DNA and cytogenetics Diagnostics Lab, Erasmus MC, Erasmus Medical Center
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

-
Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen
Significance:Benign
Review Status:no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jeune thoracic dystrophy Benign:2
Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 14, 2016
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Asphyxiating thoracic dystrophy 3 Benign:2
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Nov 11, 2023
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Likely benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.86
CADD
Benign
0.27
DANN
Benign
0.33
PhyloP100
-0.63
Mutation Taster
=99/1
polymorphism (auto)

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
dbscSNV1_ADA
Benign
0.000020
dbscSNV1_RF
Benign
0.0
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs11225812; hg19: chr11-103325908; COSMIC: COSV104398127; API