NM_001103161.2:c.826C>T
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001103161.2(SH2D5):c.826C>T(p.Arg276Trp) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000825 in 1,612,940 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 16/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. R276G) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001103161.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001103161.2. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SH2D5 | TSL:2 MANE Select | c.826C>T | p.Arg276Trp | missense | Exon 8 of 10 | ENSP00000406026.2 | Q6ZV89-1 | ||
| SH2D5 | c.826C>T | p.Arg276Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 11 | ENSP00000540190.1 | ||||
| SH2D5 | c.826C>T | p.Arg276Trp | missense | Exon 9 of 11 | ENSP00000540191.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000138 AC: 21AN: 152182Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000937 AC: 23AN: 245588 AF XY: 0.000104 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.0000760 AC: 111AN: 1460638Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000895 AC XY: 65AN XY: 726650 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000144 AC: 22AN: 152302Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000134 AC XY: 10AN XY: 74456 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at