NM_001106.4:c.210C>T

Variant names:

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points: 0P and 15B. BP4_ModerateBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS2

The NM_001106.4(ACVR2B):c.210C>T(p.Ile70Ile) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000855 in 1,614,162 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.00014 ( 0 hom., cov: 32)

Exomes 𝑓: 0.000080 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

ACVR2B
NM_001106.4 synonymous

Scores

Clinical Significance

Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:3

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.00700

Variant links:

Genes affected

ACVR2B (HGNC:174): (activin A receptor type 2B) Activins are dimeric growth and differentiation factors which belong to the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily of structurally related signaling proteins. Activins signal through a heteromeric complex of receptor serine kinases which include at least two type I (I and IB) and two type II (II and IIB) receptors. These receptors are all transmembrane proteins, composed of a ligand-binding extracellular domain with cysteine-rich region, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic domain with predicted serine/threonine specificity. Type I receptors are essential for signaling; and type II receptors are required for binding ligands and for expression of type I receptors. Type I and II receptors form a stable complex after ligand binding, resulting in phosphorylation of type I receptors by type II receptors. Type II receptors are considered to be constitutively active kinases. This gene encodes activin A type IIB receptor, which displays a 3- to 4-fold higher affinity for the ligand than activin A type II receptor. [provided by RefSeq, Jul 2008]

ACVR2B links:

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -15 ACMG points.

BP4

Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.21).

BP6

Variant 3-38477444-C-T is Benign according to our data. Variant chr3-38477444-C-T is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 344913.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.

BP7

Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.007 with no splicing effect.

BS2

High AC in GnomAd4 at 21 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACVR2B	NM_001106.4 link	c.210C>T	p.Ile70Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 11	ENST00000352511.5	NP_001097.2	Q13705-1

Ensembl

Gene	Transcript	HGVSc	HGVSp	Effect	Exon rank	TSL	MANE	Protein	UniProt
ACVR2B	ENST00000352511.5 link	c.210C>T	p.Ile70Ile	synonymous_variant	Exon 2 of 11	1	NM_001106.4	ENSP00000340361.3	Q13705-1
ACVR2B	ENST00000461232.1 link	n.3999C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 1 of 10	1
ACVR2B	ENST00000465020.5 link	n.214C>T		non_coding_transcript_exon_variant	Exon 2 of 10	2

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152184

Hom.:

Cov.:

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR

AF:

0.000145

Gnomad AMI

AF:

0.00

Gnomad AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad MID

AF:

0.00

Gnomad NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad OTH

AF:

0.00

GnomAD3 exomes

AF:

0.000111

AC:

AN:

251184

Hom.:

AF XY:

0.000125

AC XY:

AN XY:

135800

show subpopulations

Gnomad AFR exome

AF:

0.000185

Gnomad AMR exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad EAS exome

AF:

0.0000544

Gnomad SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad FIN exome

AF:

0.000370

Gnomad NFE exome

AF:

0.000123

Gnomad OTH exome

AF:

0.000326

GnomAD4 exome

AF:

0.0000800

AC:

117

AN:

1461860

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.0000784

AC XY:

AN XY:

727226

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR exome

AF:

0.000269

Gnomad4 AMR exome

AF:

0.0000224

Gnomad4 ASJ exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS exome

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN exome

AF:

0.000300

Gnomad4 NFE exome

AF:

0.0000755

Gnomad4 OTH exome

AF:

0.000116

GnomAD4 genome

AF:

0.000138

AC:

AN:

152302

Hom.:

Cov.:

AF XY:

0.000161

AC XY:

AN XY:

74470

show subpopulations

Gnomad4 AFR

AF:

0.000144

Gnomad4 AMR

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 ASJ

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 EAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 SAS

AF:

0.00

Gnomad4 FIN

AF:

0.000565

Gnomad4 NFE

AF:

0.000132

Gnomad4 OTH

AF:

0.00

Alfa

AF:

0.000228

Hom.:

Bravo

AF:

0.000125

EpiCase

AF:

0.0000545

EpiControl

AF:

0.0000593

ClinVar

Significance: Likely benign

Submissions summary: Benign:3

Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts

LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Heterotaxy, visceral, 4, autosomal

Benign:2

Aug 07, 2022

Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018

Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as likely benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of likely benign for this disease. -

ACVR2B-related disorder

Benign:1

Nov 25, 2019

PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences

Significance: Likely benign

Review Status: no assertion criteria provided

Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

BayesDel_noAF

Benign

-0.21

CADD

Benign

DANN

Benign

0.88

Splicing

Name

Calibrated prediction

Score

Prediction

SpliceAI score (max)

0.0

Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Variant summary

Frequency

Consequence

Scores

Clinical Significance

Conservation

ACMG classification

Transcripts

RefSeq

Ensembl

Frequencies

ClinVar

Submissions by phenotype

Computational scores

Splicing

Publications

LitVar

Other links and lift over