NM_001109754.4:c.708+231A>G
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001109754.4(PTPRB):c.708+231A>G variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.283 in 152,066 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6,303 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.28 ( 6303 hom., cov: 32)
Consequence
PTPRB
NM_001109754.4 intron
NM_001109754.4 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.165
Publications
7 publications found
Genes affected
PTPRB (HGNC:9665): (protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type B) The protein encoded by this gene is a member of the protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP) family. PTPs are known to be signaling molecules that regulate a variety of cellular processes including cell growth, differentiation, mitotic cycle, and oncogenic transformation. This PTP contains an extracellular domain, a single transmembrane segment and one intracytoplasmic catalytic domain, thus belongs to receptor type PTP. The extracellular region of this PTP is composed of multiple fibronectin type_III repeats, which was shown to interact with neuronal receptor and cell adhesion molecules, such as contactin and tenascin C. This protein was also found to interact with sodium channels, and thus may regulate sodium channels by altering tyrosine phosphorylation status. The functions of the interaction partners of this protein implicate the roles of this PTP in cell adhesion, neurite growth, and neuronal differentiation. Alternate transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, May 2011]
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.87).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.335 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.283 AC: 42971AN: 151948Hom.: 6288 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
42971
AN:
151948
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.283 AC: 43043AN: 152066Hom.: 6303 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.286 AC XY: 21245AN XY: 74356 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
43043
AN:
152066
Hom.:
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
AC XY:
21245
AN XY:
74356
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
14105
AN:
41488
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
4865
AN:
15284
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
911
AN:
3464
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
1119
AN:
5150
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
1430
AN:
4822
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
3081
AN:
10580
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
54
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
16768
AN:
67962
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
609
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.501
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1571
3142
4714
6285
7856
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
424
848
1272
1696
2120
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
916
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.