NM_001127671.2:c.3288C>T

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points: 0P and 21B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBP7BS1BS2

The NM_001127671.2(LIFR):​c.3288C>T​(p.Asn1096Asn) variant causes a synonymous change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000679 in 1,614,072 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 6 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.0033 ( 3 hom., cov: 32)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.00040 ( 3 hom. )

Consequence

LIFR
NM_001127671.2 synonymous

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign/Likely benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:8

Conservation

PhyloP100: -0.331
Variant links:
Genes affected
LIFR (HGNC:6597): (LIF receptor subunit alpha) This gene encodes a protein that belongs to the type I cytokine receptor family. This protein combines with a high-affinity converter subunit, gp130, to form a receptor complex that mediates the action of the leukemia inhibitory factor, a polyfunctional cytokine that is involved in cellular differentiation, proliferation and survival in the adult and the embryo. Mutations in this gene cause Schwartz-Jampel syndrome type 2, a disease belonging to the group of the bent-bone dysplasias. A translocation that involves the promoter of this gene, t(5;8)(p13;q12) with the pleiomorphic adenoma gene 1, is associated with salivary gland pleiomorphic adenoma, a common type of benign epithelial tumor of the salivary gland. Multiple splice variants encoding two different isoforms have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2018]

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification made for transcript

Verdict is Benign. Variant got -21 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.6).
BP6
Variant 5-38481601-G-A is Benign according to our data. Variant chr5-38481601-G-A is described in ClinVar as [Likely_benign]. Clinvar id is 195484.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BP7
Synonymous conserved (PhyloP=-0.331 with no splicing effect.
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population afr. gnomad4 allele frequency = 0.00333 (507/152256) while in subpopulation AFR AF= 0.0114 (474/41564). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0106. There are 3 homozygotes in gnomad4. There are 242 alleles in male gnomad4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 32. This position pass quality control queck.
BS2
High Homozygotes in GnomAd4 at 3 AR gene

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LIFRNM_001127671.2 linkc.3288C>T p.Asn1096Asn synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 20 ENST00000453190.7 NP_001121143.1 P42702-1A8K1Z4

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LIFRENST00000453190.7 linkc.3288C>T p.Asn1096Asn synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 20 2 NM_001127671.2 ENSP00000398368.2 P42702-1
LIFRENST00000263409.8 linkc.3288C>T p.Asn1096Asn synonymous_variant Exon 20 of 20 1 ENSP00000263409.4 P42702-1

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.00332
AC:
505
AN:
152138
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00138
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00154
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD3 exomes
AF:
0.00106
AC:
266
AN:
250856
Hom.:
1
AF XY:
0.000788
AC XY:
107
AN XY:
135836
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.0111
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.000838
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00315
Gnomad SAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.0000264
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000164
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.000403
AC:
589
AN:
1461816
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.000347
AC XY:
252
AN XY:
727206
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR exome
AF:
0.0137
Gnomad4 AMR exome
AF:
0.000872
Gnomad4 ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS exome
AF:
0.000856
Gnomad4 SAS exome
AF:
0.0000116
Gnomad4 FIN exome
AF:
0.0000187
Gnomad4 NFE exome
AF:
0.00000809
Gnomad4 OTH exome
AF:
0.000762
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.00333
AC:
507
AN:
152256
Hom.:
3
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.00325
AC XY:
242
AN XY:
74442
show subpopulations
Gnomad4 AFR
AF:
0.0114
Gnomad4 AMR
AF:
0.00137
Gnomad4 ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 EAS
AF:
0.00155
Gnomad4 SAS
AF:
0.000207
Gnomad4 FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad4 NFE
AF:
0.0000441
Gnomad4 OTH
AF:
0.00
Alfa
AF:
0.00208
Hom.:
2
Bravo
AF:
0.00390

ClinVar

Significance: Benign/Likely benign
Submissions summary: Benign:8
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Stuve-Wiedemann syndrome Benign:2
Sep 16, 2020
Natera, Inc.
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Stüve-Wiedemann syndrome 1 Benign:2
Dec 06, 2021
Fulgent Genetics, Fulgent Genetics
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Jan 26, 2024
ARUP Laboratories, Molecular Genetics and Genomics, ARUP Laboratories
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:2
Jan 23, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

Mar 04, 2021
GeneDx
Significance: Likely benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

not specified Benign:1
Feb 26, 2015
Eurofins Ntd Llc (ga)
Significance: Benign
Review Status: criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method: clinical testing

- -

LIFR-related disorder Benign:1
Jun 28, 2019
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance: Benign
Review Status: no assertion criteria provided
Collection Method: clinical testing

This variant is classified as benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.60
CADD
Benign
0.34
DANN
Benign
0.59

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

LitVar

Below is the list of publications found by LitVar. It may be empty.

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs3729751; hg19: chr5-38481703; API