NM_001134363.3:c.131C>A
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBS1BS2
The NM_001134363.3(RBM20):c.131C>A(p.Pro44Gln) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000213 in 1,510,006 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 5 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 13/18 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Likely benign (★★).
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001134363.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Verdict is Benign. Variant got -20 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 151442Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32
GnomAD3 exomes AF: 0.000550 AC: 62AN: 112648Hom.: 2 AF XY: 0.000753 AC XY: 47AN XY: 62410
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000225 AC: 305AN: 1358452Hom.: 5 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.000333 AC XY: 223AN XY: 669580
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000112 AC: 17AN: 151554Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000176 AC XY: 13AN XY: 74052
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not specified Benign:2
p.Pro44Gln in exon 1 of RBM20: This variant is not expected to have clinical sig nificance because it has been identified in 0.3% (62/19820) of South Asian chrom osomes, including 2 homozygotes, by the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD, htt p://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/; dbSNP rs563500712). -
- -
not provided Benign:2
- -
- -
Dilated cardiomyopathy 1DD Benign:1
- -
Cardiovascular phenotype Benign:1
This alteration is classified as likely benign based on a combination of the following: seen in unaffected individuals, population frequency, intact protein function, lack of segregation with disease, co-occurrence, RNA analysis, in silico models, amino acid conservation, lack of disease association in case-control studies, and/or the mechanism of disease or impacted region is inconsistent with a known cause of pathogenicity. -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at