NM_001134831.2:c.653A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points: 0P and 13B. BP4_StrongBP6BS1BS2
The NM_001134831.2(AHI1):āc.653A>Gā(p.Tyr218Cys) variant causes a missense change. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000237 in 1,596,558 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 2 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Conflicting classifications of pathogenicity (no stars). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. Y218H) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001134831.2 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
- Joubert syndrome 3Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE, STRONG Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), G2P, ClinGen, Laboratory for Molecular Medicine, Ambry Genetics
- Joubert syndromeInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- Joubert syndrome with ocular defectInheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet
- retinitis pigmentosaInheritance: AR, AD Classification: SUPPORTIVE, LIMITED Submitted by: Ambry Genetics, Orphanet
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -13 ACMG points.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152230Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.000528 AC: 126AN: 238538 AF XY: 0.000526 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.000237 AC: 343AN: 1444210Hom.: 2 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.000218 AC XY: 156AN XY: 716600 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.000230 AC: 35AN: 152348Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.000268 AC XY: 20AN XY: 74504 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Submissions by phenotype
not provided Uncertain:1
- -
not specified Benign:1
Variant summary: AHI1 c.653A>G (p.Tyr218Cys) results in a non-conservative amino acid change in the encoded protein sequence. Three of five in-silico tools predict a benign effect of the variant on protein function. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.00053 in 238538 control chromosomes, predominantly at a frequency of 0.0069 within the East Asian subpopulation in the gnomAD database, including 1 homozygote. The observed variant frequency within East Asian control individuals in the gnomAD database is approximately 5-fold of the estimated maximal expected allele frequency for a pathogenic variant in AHI1 causing Joubert Syndrome And Related Disorders phenotype (0.0013), strongly suggesting that the variant is a benign polymorphism found primarily in populations of East Asian origin. c.653A>G has been reported in the literature in individuals affected with retinitis pigmentosa (Huang_2015, Bryant_2018). These reports do not provide unequivocal conclusions about association of the variant with Joubert Syndrome And Related Disorders. To our knowledge, no experimental evidence demonstrating an impact on protein function has been reported. Two ClinVar submitters (evaluation after 2014) cite the variant as likely benign and one ClinVar submitter (evaluation after 2014) cites it as uncertain significance. Based on the evidence outlined above, the variant was classified as likely benign. -
Joubert syndrome Benign:1
- -
Joubert syndrome 3 Benign:1
This variant was observed as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (where applicable). Publications were found based on this search. The evidence from the literature, in combination with allele frequency data from public databases where available, was sufficient to determine this variant is unlikely to cause disease. Therefore, this variant is classified as likely benign. -
AHI1-related disorder Benign:1
This variant is classified as likely benign based on ACMG/AMP sequence variant interpretation guidelines (Richards et al. 2015 PMID: 25741868, with internal and published modifications). -
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at