NM_001136472.2:c.*1879A>G

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points: 0P and 9B. BP4_StrongBS1_SupportingBS2

The NM_001136472.2(LITAF):​c.*1879A>G variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.0000486 in 453,122 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.000053 ( 0 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.000047 ( 0 hom. )

Consequence

LITAF
NM_001136472.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Uncertain significance criteria provided, single submitter U:1

Conservation

PhyloP100: 1.24

Publications

0 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
LITAF (HGNC:16841): (lipopolysaccharide induced TNF factor) Lipopolysaccharide is a potent stimulator of monocytes and macrophages, causing secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and other inflammatory mediators. This gene encodes lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha factor, which is a DNA-binding protein and can mediate the TNF-alpha expression by direct binding to the promoter region of the TNF-alpha gene. The transcription of this gene is induced by tumor suppressor p53 and has been implicated in the p53-induced apoptotic pathway. Mutations in this gene cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C (CMT1C) and may be involved in the carcinogenesis of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD). Multiple alternatively spliced transcript variants have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Dec 2014]
LITAF Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C
    Inheritance: AD Classification: STRONG, SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Orphanet
  • Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease
    Inheritance: AD Classification: MODERATE Submitted by: ClinGen

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -9 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.5).
BS1
Variant frequency is greater than expected in population nfe. GnomAd4 allele frequency = 0.0000526 (8/152228) while in subpopulation NFE AF = 0.000118 (8/68042). AF 95% confidence interval is 0.0000584. There are 0 homozygotes in GnomAd4. There are 4 alleles in the male GnomAd4 subpopulation. Median coverage is 33. This position passed quality control check. Existence of Clinvar submissions makes me limit the strength of this signal to Supporting
BS2
High AC in GnomAd4 at 8 AD gene.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
LITAFNM_001136472.2 linkc.*1879A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 ENST00000622633.5 NP_001129944.1 Q99732-1

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
LITAFENST00000622633.5 linkc.*1879A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 NM_001136472.2 ENSP00000483114.1 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000571688.6 linkc.*1879A>G 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 4 of 4 1 ENSP00000459533.1 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000339430.9 linkc.*1879A>G downstream_gene_variant 1 ENSP00000340118.5 Q99732-1
LITAFENST00000413364.6 linkc.*2004A>G downstream_gene_variant 2 ENSP00000397958.2 Q99732-3

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.00
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.000118
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.00
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.0000691
AC:
9
AN:
130306
AF XY:
0.0000562
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.00
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.000161
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.000250
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.0000465
AC:
14
AN:
300894
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
0
AF XY:
0.0000350
AC XY:
6
AN XY:
171368
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
8510
American (AMR)
AF:
0.0000367
AC:
1
AN:
27216
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10782
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
9194
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
59600
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
12356
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
1148
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.0000822
AC:
13
AN:
158074
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
14014
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.493
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.0000526
AC:
8
AN:
152228
Hom.:
0
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.0000538
AC XY:
4
AN XY:
74378
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
41466
American (AMR)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
15270
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
5204
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
4834
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
10620
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
316
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.000118
AC:
8
AN:
68042
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.00
AC:
0
AN:
2092
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.463
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1
2
2
3
4
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Variant carriers
0
2
4
6
8
10
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.000304
Hom.:
0
Bravo
AF:
0.0000416

ClinVar

Significance: Uncertain significance
Submissions summary: Uncertain:1
Revision: criteria provided, single submitter
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1C Uncertain:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Uncertain significance
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score, this variant could not be ruled out of causing disease and therefore its association with disease required further investigation. A literature search was performed for the gene, cDNA change, and amino acid change (if applicable). No publications were found based on this search. This variant was therefore classified as a variant of unknown significance for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.50
CADD
Benign
15
DANN
Benign
0.70
PhyloP100
1.2

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.0
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs760630375; hg19: chr16-11641614; API