NM_001145536.2:c.*245G>C

Variant summary

Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points: 0P and 20B. BP4_StrongBP6_Very_StrongBA1

The NM_001145536.2(C17orf107):​c.*245G>C variant causes a 3 prime UTR change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.142 in 1,608,764 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 16,889 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Benign (★★).

Frequency

Genomes: 𝑓 0.16 ( 2132 hom., cov: 33)
Exomes 𝑓: 0.14 ( 14757 hom. )

Consequence

C17orf107
NM_001145536.2 3_prime_UTR

Scores

2

Clinical Significance

Benign criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts B:9

Conservation

PhyloP100: 0.232

Publications

10 publications found
Variant links:
Genes affected
C17orf107 (HGNC:37238): (chromosome 17 open reading frame 107)
CHRNE (HGNC:1966): (cholinergic receptor nicotinic epsilon subunit) Acetylcholine receptors at mature mammalian neuromuscular junctions are pentameric protein complexes composed of four subunits in the ratio of two alpha subunits to one beta, one epsilon, and one delta subunit. The acetylcholine receptor changes subunit composition shortly after birth when the epsilon subunit replaces the gamma subunit seen in embryonic receptors. Mutations in the epsilon subunit are associated with congenital myasthenic syndrome. [provided by RefSeq, Sep 2009]
CHRNE Gene-Disease associations (from GenCC):
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: DEFINITIVE Submitted by: Illumina
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 4A
    Inheritance: AD, AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 4B
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp, Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), PanelApp Australia
  • congenital myasthenic syndrome 4C
    Inheritance: AR Classification: STRONG Submitted by: Genomics England PanelApp
  • postsynaptic congenital myasthenic syndrome
    Inheritance: AR Classification: SUPPORTIVE Submitted by: Orphanet

Genome browser will be placed here

ACMG classification

Classification was made for transcript

Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -20 ACMG points.

BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.81).
BP6
Variant 17-4900778-G-C is Benign according to our data. Variant chr17-4900778-G-C is described in ClinVar as [Benign]. Clinvar id is 254903.Status of the report is criteria_provided_multiple_submitters_no_conflicts, 2 stars.
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.212 is higher than 0.05.

Transcripts

RefSeq

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank MANE Protein UniProt
C17orf107NM_001145536.2 linkc.*245G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 ENST00000381365.4 NP_001139008.1 Q6ZR85
CHRNENM_000080.4 linkc.917+15C>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 11 ENST00000649488.2 NP_000071.1 Q04844

Ensembl

Gene Transcript HGVSc HGVSp Effect Exon rank TSL MANE Protein Appris UniProt
C17orf107ENST00000381365.4 linkc.*245G>C 3_prime_UTR_variant Exon 3 of 3 2 NM_001145536.2 ENSP00000370770.3 Q6ZR85
CHRNEENST00000649488.2 linkc.917+15C>G intron_variant Intron 8 of 11 NM_000080.4 ENSP00000497829.1 Q04844

Frequencies

GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
0.161
AC:
24557
AN:
152162
Hom.:
2132
Cov.:
33
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR
AF:
0.216
Gnomad AMI
AF:
0.150
Gnomad AMR
AF:
0.174
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
0.155
Gnomad EAS
AF:
0.0884
Gnomad SAS
AF:
0.149
Gnomad FIN
AF:
0.121
Gnomad MID
AF:
0.171
Gnomad NFE
AF:
0.138
Gnomad OTH
AF:
0.175
GnomAD2 exomes
AF:
0.143
AC:
34080
AN:
238054
AF XY:
0.143
show subpopulations
Gnomad AFR exome
AF:
0.214
Gnomad AMR exome
AF:
0.158
Gnomad ASJ exome
AF:
0.143
Gnomad EAS exome
AF:
0.0844
Gnomad FIN exome
AF:
0.129
Gnomad NFE exome
AF:
0.139
Gnomad OTH exome
AF:
0.155
GnomAD4 exome
AF:
0.140
AC:
204526
AN:
1456484
Hom.:
14757
Cov.:
32
AF XY:
0.141
AC XY:
101812
AN XY:
724428
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.216
AC:
7200
AN:
33290
American (AMR)
AF:
0.161
AC:
7073
AN:
44006
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.145
AC:
3767
AN:
26052
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.117
AC:
4609
AN:
39450
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.149
AC:
12805
AN:
85804
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.132
AC:
6990
AN:
52990
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.203
AC:
1168
AN:
5740
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.137
AC:
152182
AN:
1108982
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.145
AC:
8732
AN:
60170
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.502
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
10803
21606
32408
43211
54014
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Exome Het
Exome Hom
Variant carriers
0
5548
11096
16644
22192
27740
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
0.161
AC:
24575
AN:
152280
Hom.:
2132
Cov.:
33
AF XY:
0.160
AC XY:
11910
AN XY:
74454
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
0.215
AC:
8957
AN:
41566
American (AMR)
AF:
0.174
AC:
2662
AN:
15300
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
0.155
AC:
537
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
0.0886
AC:
457
AN:
5160
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
0.149
AC:
717
AN:
4828
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
0.121
AC:
1279
AN:
10606
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
0.173
AC:
51
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
0.138
AC:
9415
AN:
68026
Other (OTH)
AF:
0.172
AC:
363
AN:
2116
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.508
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1114
2229
3343
4458
5572
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance

Age Distribution

Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
252
504
756
1008
1260
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
0.146
Hom.:
326
Bravo
AF:
0.169
Asia WGS
AF:
0.132
AC:
460
AN:
3478

ClinVar

Significance: Benign
Submissions summary: Benign:9
Revision: criteria provided, multiple submitters, no conflicts
LINK: link

Submissions by phenotype

not specified Benign:3
-
PreventionGenetics, part of Exact Sciences
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Jun 23, 2025
Women's Health and Genetics/Laboratory Corporation of America, LabCorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 04, 2016
GeneDx
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant is considered likely benign or benign based on one or more of the following criteria: it is a conservative change, it occurs at a poorly conserved position in the protein, it is predicted to be benign by multiple in silico algorithms, and/or has population frequency not consistent with disease. -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome 4A Benign:2
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Feb 03, 2025
Labcorp Genetics (formerly Invitae), Labcorp
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome 4C Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

not provided Benign:1
-
Breakthrough Genomics, Breakthrough Genomics
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:not provided

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome 4B Benign:1
Jul 10, 2021
Genome-Nilou Lab
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

- -

Congenital myasthenic syndrome Benign:1
Jan 13, 2018
Illumina Laboratory Services, Illumina
Significance:Benign
Review Status:criteria provided, single submitter
Collection Method:clinical testing

This variant was observed in the ICSL laboratory as part of a predisposition screen in an ostensibly healthy population. It had not been previously curated by ICSL or reported in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD: prior to June 1st, 2018), and was therefore a candidate for classification through an automated scoring system. Utilizing variant allele frequency, disease prevalence and penetrance estimates, and inheritance mode, an automated score was calculated to assess if this variant is too frequent to cause the disease. Based on the score and internal cut-off values, a variant classified as benign is not then subjected to further curation. The score for this variant resulted in a classification of benign for this disease. -

Computational scores

Source: dbNSFP v4.3

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
-0.81
CADD
Benign
1.1
DANN
Benign
0.50
PhyloP100
0.23
Mutation Taster
=19/81
disease causing

Splicing

Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
0.030
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2

Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at spliceailookup.broadinstitute.org

Publications

Other links and lift over

dbSNP: rs12942540; hg19: chr17-4804073; COSMIC: COSV53417534; COSMIC: COSV53417534; API