NM_001146079.2:c.-81-567T>C
Variant names:
Variant summary
Our verdict is Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points: 0P and 12B. BP4_StrongBA1
The NM_001146079.2(CLDN14):c.-81-567T>C variant causes a intron change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.304 in 151,930 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, including 8,358 homozygotes. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. No clinical diagnostic laboratories have submitted clinical-significance assessments for this variant to ClinVar.
Frequency
Genomes: 𝑓 0.30 ( 8358 hom., cov: 31)
Consequence
CLDN14
NM_001146079.2 intron
NM_001146079.2 intron
Scores
2
Clinical Significance
Not reported in ClinVar
Conservation
PhyloP100: 0.526
Publications
11 publications found
Genes affected
CLDN14 (HGNC:2035): (claudin 14) Tight junctions represent one mode of cell-to-cell adhesion in epithelial or endothelial cell sheets, forming continuous seals around cells and serving as a physical barrier to prevent solutes and water from passing freely through the paracellular space. These junctions are comprised of sets of continuous networking strands in the outwardly facing cytoplasmic leaflet, with complementary grooves in the inwardly facing extracytoplasmic leaflet. The protein encoded by this gene, a member of the claudin family, is an integral membrane protein and a component of tight junction strands. The encoded protein also binds specifically to the WW domain of Yes-associated protein. Defects in this gene are the cause of an autosomal recessive form of nonsyndromic sensorineural deafness. It is also reported that four synonymous variants in this gene are associated with kidney stones and reduced bone mineral density. Several transcript variants encoding the same protein have been found for this gene. [provided by RefSeq, Jun 2010]
LNCTSI (HGNC:56660): (lncRNA TGF-beta/SMAD3 pathway interacting)
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Classification was made for transcript
Our verdict: Benign. The variant received -12 ACMG points.
BP4
Computational evidence support a benign effect (BayesDel_noAF=-0.83).
BA1
GnomAd4 highest subpopulation (AFR) allele frequency at 95% confidence interval = 0.492 is higher than 0.05.
Transcripts
RefSeq
Ensembl
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.304 AC: 46085AN: 151812Hom.: 8319 Cov.: 31 show subpopulations
GnomAD3 genomes
AF:
AC:
46085
AN:
151812
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
Gnomad AFR
AF:
Gnomad AMI
AF:
Gnomad AMR
AF:
Gnomad ASJ
AF:
Gnomad EAS
AF:
Gnomad SAS
AF:
Gnomad FIN
AF:
Gnomad MID
AF:
Gnomad NFE
AF:
Gnomad OTH
AF:
We have no GnomAD4 exomes data on this position. Probably position not covered by the project.
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.304 AC: 46175AN: 151930Hom.: 8358 Cov.: 31 AF XY: 0.295 AC XY: 21913AN XY: 74268 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 genome
AF:
AC:
46175
AN:
151930
Hom.:
Cov.:
31
AF XY:
AC XY:
21913
AN XY:
74268
show subpopulations
African (AFR)
AF:
AC:
20606
AN:
41374
American (AMR)
AF:
AC:
3819
AN:
15262
Ashkenazi Jewish (ASJ)
AF:
AC:
834
AN:
3472
East Asian (EAS)
AF:
AC:
39
AN:
5178
South Asian (SAS)
AF:
AC:
715
AN:
4816
European-Finnish (FIN)
AF:
AC:
2222
AN:
10574
Middle Eastern (MID)
AF:
AC:
96
AN:
294
European-Non Finnish (NFE)
AF:
AC:
17082
AN:
67940
Other (OTH)
AF:
AC:
646
AN:
2110
Allele Balance Distribution
Red line indicates average allele balance
Average allele balance: 0.497
Heterozygous variant carriers
0
1458
2917
4375
5834
7292
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.95
Allele balance
Age Distribution
Genome Het
Genome Hom
Variant carriers
0
440
880
1320
1760
2200
<30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
>80
Age
Alfa
AF:
Hom.:
Bravo
AF:
Asia WGS
AF:
AC:
432
AN:
3478
ClinVar
Not reported inComputational scores
Source:
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
BayesDel_noAF
Benign
DANN
Benign
PhyloP100
Splicing
Name
Calibrated prediction
Score
Prediction
SpliceAI score (max)
Details are displayed if max score is > 0.2
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at
Publications
You must be logged in to view publications. This limit was set because tens of millions (!) of queries from AI bots are generated daily.