NM_001163922.3:c.1754A>G
Variant summary
Our verdict is Likely benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points: 0P and 4B. BP4_Strong
The NM_001163922.3(VSIG10L):c.1754A>G(p.His585Arg) variant causes a missense change involving the alteration of a non-conserved nucleotide. The variant allele was found at a frequency of 0.000006 in 1,499,390 control chromosomes in the GnomAD database, with no homozygous occurrence. In-silico tool predicts a benign outcome for this variant. 15/22 in silico tools predict a benign outcome for this variant. Variant has been reported in ClinVar as Uncertain significance (★). Another variant affecting the same amino acid position, but resulting in a different missense (i.e. H585Q) has been classified as Uncertain significance.
Frequency
Consequence
NM_001163922.3 missense
Scores
Clinical Significance
Conservation
Publications
Genome browser will be placed here
ACMG classification
Our verdict: Likely_benign. The variant received -4 ACMG points.
Variant Effect in Transcripts
ACMG analysis was done for transcript: NM_001163922.3. You can select a different transcript below to see updated ACMG assignments.
Ensembl Transcripts
| Sel. | Gene | Transcript | Tags | HGVSc | HGVSp | Effect | Exon Rank | Protein | UniProt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VSIG10L | TSL:5 MANE Select | c.1754A>G | p.His585Arg | missense | Exon 6 of 10 | ENSP00000335623.3 | Q86VR7-1 | ||
| VSIG10L | TSL:1 | n.372A>G | non_coding_transcript_exon | Exon 3 of 7 | |||||
| VSIG10L | c.1754A>G | p.His585Arg | missense | Exon 6 of 11 | ENSP00000585630.1 |
Frequencies
GnomAD3 genomes AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 show subpopulations
GnomAD2 exomes AF: 0.0000277 AC: 3AN: 108320 AF XY: 0.0000531 show subpopulations
GnomAD4 exome AF: 0.00000445 AC: 6AN: 1347400Hom.: 0 Cov.: 33 AF XY: 0.00000909 AC XY: 6AN XY: 659802 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
GnomAD4 genome AF: 0.0000197 AC: 3AN: 151990Hom.: 0 Cov.: 32 AF XY: 0.0000269 AC XY: 2AN XY: 74230 show subpopulations
Age Distribution
ClinVar
Computational scores
Source:
Splicing
Find out detailed SpliceAI scores and Pangolin per-transcript scores at